ping tour s review

PING Tour-S wedge

A review of the PING Tour-S wedge review

• Sign up to Golf Monthly Newsletter Newsletter

PING have got the sole design just right here and however open you have the face, it still seems to sit right. The PING Tour-S works well on pitch shots, proving plenty of zip when the ball hits the green.

Why you can trust Golf Monthly Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test .

The stainless steel PING Tour-S wedge has a Brushed Chrome finish, while its grooves are Tour legal, promising improved control. Multiple loft/bounce combinations are available.

The face can be set open or closed but the cavity design doesn't look as good in the bag as some.

W: ping.com

Get the Golf Monthly Newsletter

Subscribe to the Golf Monthly newsletter to stay up to date with all the latest tour news, equipment news, reviews, head-to-heads and buyer’s guides from our team of experienced experts.

World No.1 Scheffler and American compatriot Burns will have more than golf on their minds this week as they are both close to becoming fathers

By James Nursey Published 9 April 24

We recap the history of the pre-Masters feast and look back at some iconic menus

By Andrew Wright Published 9 April 24

Days after the solar eclipse was witnessed on the east coast of the US, storms are expected to arrive over Augusta National Golf Club

By Jonny Leighfield Published 9 April 24

• Contact Future's experts
• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Accessibility statement
• Cookies policy
• Advertise with us

Golf Monthly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

Iron Reviews

The big review – ping s-56 irons and tour-s wedges.

So what does Ping have to say about these clubs. S-56,  “The steel body design with variable tungsten toe weighting positions the CG for higher launching long irons and more controlled, penetrating trajectories in the short irons. Its patent-pending Stabilizing Bar™ Technology varies in width throughout the set to optimise each iron’s CG location”, Tour-S, “its machined face and grooves are engineered to optimise spin for greater control. The traditional shape of the heads features tour-inspired sole geometry for enhanced shot making from all conditions. Its vertical Custom Tuning Port angles toward the back surface to increase the perimeter weighting for added forgiveness”.

The Ping ethos has always valued performance over appearance and that is still true with these irons. That said, you get the impression that the lumps and bumps and hosel notches are there for a reason not because someone in marketing thought that it looked pretty. Pings look like they are there to do the job and they do the job as well as anyone else. The milled face and the brushed satin finish ooze quality and the legendary Ping durability means that they will look new for longer than almost any other make. The cavity is fairly shallow, even in the long irons and the back of the club is never visible at address. The minimal offset is another indicator that these are for better players.

Despite not being forged Ping have shown that cast irons can have great feel. While you’re not going to get the same sensation as a 1020 steel forging, Ping have worked their magic with the 17-4 stainless steel in these irons and I have to say that having come from testing a series of forged irons, I was pleasantly surprised with just how good they were. The sensation on flushed shots is one of complete solidity, slight miss-hits feel almost no different and even more severe miss-hits produce far better results that you expect. The wedges are very similar, not quite the top of the line but close enough as to make no difference.

Performance

The S-56 irons offer a fantastic mix of control and distance. Purely on performance the S-56 are as good as anything on the market, especially in the long irons. For a blade sized long iron to offer the forgiveness and control that they do is an unbelievable achievement. Better players will be tempted to throw away the hybrids with these that are that good. The stabilizing bar technology and weighting certainly has something to do with this and the COG location is spot on. There was some talk of golfers losing distance with the previous generation S-57 but that is not an issue here. Ball flight is plenty long and comparable to any other set of similarly lofted irons.Despite having a fairly flat sole, the irons seem to resist digging and the white paint-fill on the bottom groove makes aligning the club very easy.

Short irons and the S-Tour wedges both produce high spin from low trajectories and the sole grind on the wedges is excellent where the back of the sole is strongly ground away along the rear third making these clubs very versatile around the green and allowing play from almost any lie – possibly one reason the Tour-S wedges have been seen in the bag of Triple Major winner Padraig Harrington. As with all clubs with grooves conforming to the new Condition of Competition rules, spin rates have dropped from wet lies or thick rough but hitting from the fairway sees no difference in the amount of control you can exert. The wedges address the ball beautifully and with the accuracy available you can knock down pins all day.

While it may be more claymore than katana in the look and feel departments, you cannot ignore the staggering performance. The practically unrivalled combination of distance and control with fantastic forgiveness for that head size means that the S56 must be on your short-list when you are considering buying players irons. Ping seemed to have cracked the problem of making blade type irons with game improvement level of forgiveness in a way that must have all the competition worried. The Tour-S wedges are a great accompaniment for the irons as they blend seamlessly in to create a set of clubs that anyone would be happy to play.

Spy Pics of the New TMag R11 Driver

Feeling The Heat In Malaysia

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

You may like

Rory McIlroy spotted testing a new TaylorMade “PROTO” 4-iron at the 2024 Valero Texas Open

Ben Baller’s 24K gold 1-of-1 Scotty Cameron Circle-T putter, and one of the coolest gear setups in golf

“Pants Drunk”: Geno Bonnalie shows off Joel Dahmen’s hilarious custom iron stampings

Here’s why Vijay Singh has red numbers written all over his irons

Titleist launches new Vokey WedgeWorks 60 “A” grind wedge

Tursky: I tested Titleist’s new 2023 T-Series irons (including the new T150 and T350). Here’s what happened…

Club Junkie

Club junkie review: cobra’s new king tour irons.

The Cobra King Tour irons have been proven on the PGA Tour already and will be in bags of better amateur players this year. The previous King Tour MIM irons were very underrated and offered great precision with a solid shape that many players liked. Cobra went away from the Metal Injection Molded construction and went with a five-step forging process for soft and solid feel.

Make sure to check out the full podcast review at the links below and search GolfWRX Radio on every podcast platform.

I was a big fan of the previous Tour MIM irons and played them in rotation throughout the last two years. Out of the box, I was impressed with the more simple and clean look of the badging on the new King Tour. Badging is mostly silver with just small black accents that should appeal to even the pickiest golfers. I didn’t notice the shorter blade length in the new irons but did notice that the leading edge is just slightly more rounded. Topline is thin, but not razor thin, but still has enough there to give you the confidence that you don’t have to hit it on the dead center every shot.

Feel is solid and soft with just a slight click to the thud on well struck shots while mishits are met with a little more sound and vibration to the hands.

These King Tour irons are built to be cannons and place more emphasis on consistent and precise shots. I also felt like the new irons launch easily and maybe a touch higher than some irons in the same category.

My launch monitor showed my 7 iron with an average launch angle of 22 degrees and spin right around 5,800 with a Project X LZ 6.0 stock shaft. Ball speed isn’t the ultimate focus of this iron but it did well with an average around 108mph and the iron was able to keep the speed up well when you didn’t strike the center. You will still see a drop off in speed and distance when you miss the center, but you don’t have to be Navy SEAL sniper accurate on the face to achieve a good shot. Dispersion was very tight, and while there are bigger irons with more forgiveness, this players cavity still allows good playability when you aren’t bringing your A-plus game to the course.

Cobra lists the King Tour as an iron for a Tour level player up to a 7 handicap and I think this iron could see the bags of more golfers than that. I am a 9.4 handicap, and I felt more than comfortable playing this iron even on less than perfect days.

Review: Honma TW737-Vs Forged Irons

Pros:  Incredible feel all the way through the bag. These irons offer considerable forgiveness on mishits, and their slightly stronger lofts generate plenty of distance for a better-player forged iron.

Cons:  Some will find the price point ($150 per club) too high to consider.

Bottom Line:  The entire TW737 line boasts impressive specs and looks. The TW737-Vs, with their slightly larger shape and stronger lofts, could be perfect for the player ready to move from game-improvement irons to better players irons or for those those looking for more forgiveness in a forged set.

Many GolfWRX Members will already be familiar with Honma Golf, known for its intricately crafted clubs and as one of the most prestigious, fastest-growing golf brands in the world. For others, this review will be the first time they’ve heard of Honma, or seen their iconic “mole in a hole” cloisonné and wondered, “What’s that?”

That is about to change. Honma, a mainstay in the Japanese Domestic Market for almost 60 years, is making a major push to become a household name in the U.S. and Europe. This year marks the company’s first entry into national “Hot List” competitions, and you can now find and test some of their products, such as the TW737 irons, in big-box golf stores like the PGA Superstore.

While Honma has traditionally been associated with extremely high-end clubs —  even gold-plated at times — the Tour World line is priced similarly with other forged irons from domestic manufacturers. Tour World also happens to be the line played by their tour pros like Hideto Tanihara , who has the TW737-Vs in his bag.

Related: More photos of Honma’s Tour World irons, driving irons and wedges

There are three unique models in the Tour World 737 line, each with slight variations in loft and head shape that are designed to fit the specific needs of forged-iron users. Each model includes Honma’s unified face progression and center of gravity design, which essentially allows for slight changes in sole width, face thickness, and head size based on loft, while keeping the same offset. The design is great in and of itself, and it also makes it easier to play a Tour World combo set.

The entire TW737 iron line is forged from S25C steel using Honma’s proprietary high strength W-Forging , a two-stage forging process that mixes hot and cold forging. According to the company, the process creates more density in the club face, especially high on the face. The extra strength is said to increase ball speed and forgiveness.

• The TW737-Vn  is made particularly for better golfers who like the shape and workability of a blade, but want a little more forgiveness.
• The TW737-V  has a small cavity-back head, but adds a little more forgiveness and distance than the Vn.
• The TW737-Vs , the model I tested, has a slightly larger head and strongest lofts, making it the longest and most forgiving of the three forged irons in the TW737 lineup.

You can find all the  specs on the Honma site here .  The TW737-Vs specs are below.

TW737-Vs irons are available now in 3-11 ($150 per club). A variety of stock shafts are available and include the NS Pro 950GH, Dynamic Gold AMT, Modus3 Tour, and Vizard 160. Honma has a  retailer search on its site  to help you find nearby golf stores where you can check out these clubs for yourself. Of course, custom shaft and grip options are available.

My set of TW737-Vs

I decided on the TW737-Vs because I wanted the extra performance and forgiveness. Honma built a 3-11 iron set, standard length, 0.5-degrees upright with Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Compound grips and two wraps of tape.

Having played cast, game-improvement irons my entire golfing life, I was anxious to see how these clubs would look at address, feel at impact and most importantly, how they would perform for my swing. In recent years, I have been using a forged Vega wedge, also an iconic Japanese brand. I love the feel, so I was excited for these.

You might be wondering, “Why test against a cast club and not compare Honma to Honma or Honma to Miura?” One reason is that like many of you, I’m precisely who Honma is looking to attract — a US-based consumer who has been playing mostly domestic clubs.

Take it one step further, I’ve also been looking to put forged clubs in the bag and make the move to the better-player iron category, but I was hesitant for a variety of reasons. I mentioned to a few other golfer that I was reviewing this set and their reaction was the same. Are they blades? Are they small? Are they hard to hit? All responses were followed by, “I don’t think I’d be ready for forged clubs.”

After testing I can tell you the irons are not too small, not too hard to hit, and stack up to anything else I’ve tested.

I like to start testing outside before getting on a launch monitor so I can focus purely on what I’m seeing and feeling. And with these clubs, my expectations were high, very high.

I started with the 11-iron because… how often do you get to hit a club stamped with an 11? I’ve always taken a significant divot with my wedges, but my first swing resulted in a solid, crisp shot with a thinner divot. Everything about the shot felt perfect. This happened to be a center strike and impact felt like almost nothing at all… in a good way. The sound was solid and strong, but the first real feeing I registered was slicing through the turf.

That feeling continued even with the long irons. Hitting a 3 or 4-iron around the middle provided plenty of feedback, but the more pure the strike, the less feeling there was. The ball flight appeared to be slightly lower than my current set, with a straight-to-draw flight and similar distances. Working the ball both ways was not a problem.

On the course, I struggled with distance control at first. This was my own fault for not dialing in the distances, especially with the stronger lofts in the 7-iron and shorter clubs. My expectation was that these clubs would not fly as far as my current clubs, but I couldn’t have been more wrong.

The exceptional feel continued. Truly effortless power on center strikes. The ball just jumped off the face and provided plenty of feedback and forgiveness. My divots from fairway lies were thinner than normal, which I don’t mind at all. These clubs cut through the rough nicely as well.

My favorite moment came at an island-green par-3, No. 16 at BridgeMill Athletic Club. I had 160 yards to the pin, with 150 yards covering the water and 175 yards to the water at the back of the green. With my old set, it would have been a smooth 8-iron (a full 9-iron is a reliable 145 yard carry). For me, the TW737-Vs 9-iron is essentially an 8.5-iron, so I went with 9-iron and played to the center with a little draw. I hit one of the most solid shots of the day, and it landed just a few feet away from the pin. Trusting a 9-iron would be enough… now that was fun.

Launch Monitor Data

My expectation going into launch monitor testing was that I’d see a flatter trajectory, lower peak height, similar distance and spin, and a decent amount of help on mishits.  I tested the TW737-Vs on SkyTrak against my TaylorMade RSi 2’s using Bridgestone Tour B330 balls. I rotated clubs every 5 shots and went through multiple rounds with each club.

The launch monitor data backed up what I was seeing on the course. For the short and mid irons, the Honmas generated slightly more distance (not less as I expected prior to testing). The 9-iron had the biggest gap, but the TW737-Vs is also 2 degrees stronger.

Spin was lower, but I was also seeing slightly more draw bias to my shots. While the spin looks a little low, on the course I had no issues stopping the ball on approach shots. With the long irons, my flatter trajectory always forces me to play for a little roll, so that won’t change.

I’ve never been a high ball hitter. My swing produces a lower flight and I’m sticking with it. Not surprisingly, my launch angle and peak height with the TW737-Vs was slightly lower across the board.

Ball speed on heel and toe side of center dropped about 2 mph on average, but the shots were very playable. With the 3 and 4-irons, toe shots generated quite a bit more left spin, but heel shots didn’t really impact the flight.

For shots higher on the face, I was very surprised and happy to see a minimal loss of distance. All in all, these clubs are very playable and forgiving on shots that miss the dead center of the clubface.

Looks and Feel

Feel is subjective, but I love the way these clubs feel. There is a nice weight through the swing. The W-Forging process has created a strong face that fires balls off like little rockets. Some other irons have a spring-like feel at impact, but with these, center shots just seemed to melt into my hands.

I spent a lot of time using powder spray on the face to see the exact impact location. With other irons I’ve tested, it is easy to know if I hit the extreme toe or heel side. But with the TW737-Vs, I was able to feel if I was half a ball to the heel or toe side. Same with being low on the face or a few grooves high. Both better players and mid-handicap golfers looking to improve will appreciate the feedback these clubs provide.

As for looks, “These are beautifully simple” was my first thought when I saw them in person. The lines are clean and sharp in some areas and smooth and rounded in others. The head, while definitely smaller than what I’m used to, doesn’t feel or look too small. I don’t have any confidence issues looking down at the ball.

Each of the TW737 models have the same minimal amount of offset, creating a relatively straight edge from the shaft out to the toe. I find it easier to set up and align clubs with less offset, so I like this a lot. I wouldn’t call the top line thin, but it isn’t thick either. Overall, I just really like how these irons look at address.

Bottom Line

Honma might not be the first name most Americans think of when they think of forged irons. That is going to change… not just because Honma will be spending more money to reach golfers in North America, but because the company’s Tour World line is both beautifully crafted and packed with performance.

If you’re in the market for forged players irons, make sure the TW737 is on the list of clubs to hit.

GolfWRX Member Reviews: TaylorMade 2017 M1 and M2 Irons

One of the many benefits of being a GolfWRX Forum Member is exclusive access to Giveaways and Testing Threads. For Giveaways — we give away everything from golf clubs to golf balls to GPS units — all it takes is a forum name. Enter any Giveaway, and we select winners randomly. You’re then free to enjoy your prize as you wish.

For Testing Threads, the process a bit more involved. GolfWRX Forum Members sign up to test the latest and greatest products in golf, and then they provide in-depth reviews on the equipment. Being the intelligent golf-equipment users they are, GoflWRX Members are able to provide the most-informed and unbiased reviews on the Internet.

In this Testing Thread , we selected 75 members to test a TaylorMade M1 2017 7-iron and TaylorMade M2 7-iron. Each of the clubs were built with the stock lofts and shafts — M2 2017 (28.5 degrees) with a TaylorMade Reax shaft, and M1 2017 (30.5 degrees) with a True Temper Dynamic Gold S300 shaft — and the testers were instructed to post their review of the clubs here .

Below, we’ve selected what we’ve deemed the most in-depth and educated reviews out of the 75 testers. We have edited each of the posts for brevity, clarity and grammar.

Thanks to all of those involved in the testing!

• All 75 Reviews: TaylorMade M1 and M2 Testing Thread
• Tech Talk: What you need to know about TaylorMade’s M1 and M2 irons

To be honest, looking down on the TaylorMade M1 and M2 irons at address, there is really not much difference. I would have to pick one up to see which is which.

The first 10 balls I hit were with M1 and 6/10 felt great, while the other 4 were toe hits, which I felt and the distance reflected that. Kinda what I expected with a club design for lower-handicap players. Distance was about 1/2 longer than my Srixon iron and dispersion was close, as well. I will say they did not feel as good as the Srixon on center hits.

Next 10 (ok, 15) balls were with the M2. Wow, can you say “up, up and away? The ball really popped of the club face, but wasn’t a ballon flight. Waited for the ball to come down and WTH, with the roll out it was 5-8 yards longer than balls hit with M1, and that is with a few toe shots. I did some smooth swings and then very aggressive swings and was a little amazed at this iron. Just like the M1, it does not have the forged feeling and does have a clicky sound (which I hate).

Bottom line: M2 is the longest iron I have ever hit. I love my 545s, but I could see myself playing M2 very easily. Matter of fact, I will be taking this M2 7 iron in my bag and play it more head-to-head against my Srixon 545 on the course.

deathbymuffin

These are both beautiful clubs. What surprised me the most is how much alike the two clubs look at address. I was expecting a chunky topline and significant offset in the M2, but it’s footprint looked almost exactly the same as the M1, outside of the chrome finish on the M2 versus the frosted finish of the M1. The M2 could almost pass as a player’s iron to my eye at address. These clubs both get A’s from me in the looks department.

The M1 felt a tad thicker than most player’s irons I’m used to, but it seemed to come with a bit of added forgiveness too. Well-struck shots felt good, with a nice mid-trajectory and with the workability that I’ve come to expect from a player’s iron. But true to TaylorMade’s claims, the M1 seemed more forgiving than a traditional player’s iron. Had a nice soft feel at impact, mishits didn’t sting and left you with a more playable result. A really nice combination of the better attributes of both player’s and game improvement irons. I’ve been playing with an old set of Tommy Armour blades, but I’ve been recently wanting more forgiveness for when I’m stuck with my B or C swing. Based on the early returns, I could definitely see myself bagging these.

I’m not sure if it’s the shaft, the design of the clubhead, or a combination of both, but the M2 is definitely a different animal than the M1 at impact. This club launches the ball high, arguably ridiculously so. I was hitting Jason Day moonbombs with this bad boy. Didn’t seem to matter what kind of swing I put on it, the ball launched high, flat and dead straight. The club was super forgiving and if not for the insanely high ball flight, I would love to have a set of these for when my swing is out of sorts. I didn’t really try to flight it at all, so I’m not sure what it’s capable of at this point. One other note was that the M2 had a clicky feel at impact. It didn’t bother me since it still felt so sweet… so strange as it sounds, clicky, but smooth and sweet at the same time. I think these clubs will be big winners with the mid-to-high handicap set.

The M1 is a fine iron, but doesn’t really stand out in any way from other irons of its class.

The M2, on the other hand, is an iron on steroids. I’m really starting to love this thing. It’s super forgiving and just goes and goes. According to my laser, flush shots were going 195 yards (my usual blade 5 iron distance) and very high. I can’t help but think golf would be a whole lot easier, particularly longer courses with long par 3s, with a full set of these in my bag.

poppyhillsguy

M1 feels softer than the M2 and I felt the ball flight was more consistent and what I want in an iron. The M1 did have a harsher feeling in my hands than I typically like, but I’m going to credit a lot of that to the range balls.

M2 flies very high. It was a windy afternoon and about 100 degrees. I love the high ball flight on the range, but I have a concern what that ball flight would be like on the course. I like to hit the ball different heights for different shots and I don’t think I could do that confidently with the M2, but I could with the M1. I don’t like the sound of the M2. It sounded “clicky” to me.

Initially on the range I was scared because the M1 had a regular flex in it, so I took it easy for my initial 10-15 swings with it. Ball SHOT off the face, loud crack (didn’t care for it, but not too bad) and ball just kept rising and rising but didn’t balloon. I thought, “whoa,” that’s not what I expected…did it again…another CRACK and the ball just flew. I set another down and I paid attention to how it looked behind the ball, not much offset for a game improvement and I thought…”I could actually play this club!”  The 5-7 were EASY swings, aimed at a target of 170 yards away (my normal 7 iron distance) and with a EASY swing I was flying it by 20 yards or so. The next 5-10 I really went after it, same CRACK and ball just flew but to my surprise it was a nice draw, harder draw than the first but it was a nice 10-yard draw. This time the balls were landing just short of the 200 yard marker. Damn, 200 yards with a 7 iron! I know they are jacked lofts but it feels good to say “my 7 irons just few 190-200 yards!”

P.S. LOVE the Lamkin UTX grip!

Now, this was interesting, the M2 was quieter then the M1… weird!  Now, there is more carbon fiber added to this one and there is a “Geocoustic” label on the back. I am sure that it has something to do with all that carbon fiber but it does have a better sound. Other than the sound, it played exactly like the M1: long and straight. The REAX shaft felt a little weaker than the True Temper shaft and it flew a little higher but nothing else I could pick up.

noahdavis_7

Finally got out to the range after getting these bad boys in on Friday. My first impression of them is that they look really sharp. The graphics and design really stand out and really give these clubs a cool, modern look.

They were both a little to big IMO, as I am currently bagging Mizuno MP-68s. The M2 isa definite “game improvement iron”, while the M1 was similar in size and shape to my previous irons, Titleist AP1s.

They both really launch it, high and far. Ridiculous for 7 irons. I don’t have access to a launch monitor, but it was about a 20-yard difference between my gamer 7 iron and these (stronger lofts, as well).

The M1 definitely was more suited for my eye, and produced more consistent ball flights. It felt much more smooth and solid as the M2 had a clicky, cheap feel.

The M2 just isn’t for me. I felt like it was launching too high and ballooning, which could be due to the shaft (the M1 had the S300, while the M2 just had a stock “Reax” shaft).  The feel off the face of the M2 just turned me off, to be honest.

While I don’t think I’ll be putting either model in play, I can definitely see the appeal for mid-to-high handicaps. Both irons were super forgiving, and they should be a dream to the average weekend golfer who has trouble with ball striking consistently.

golfnut5438

Looks: As expected, I preferred the M1 with less offset, slightly smaller sole and a smoother finish. Less glare looking down on the iron. I must say the M2 did not look as bulky, or have as much offset as I thought it might have.

Feel: This was a close race, probably due to the shafts as much as the heads. The M1 was just a slight bit smoother feeling on solid shots. But the M2 was not bad at all, just not quite as smooth.

Distance and performance: Our range has a slight incline up the length of the range, so specific yardage gains or losses were difficult to measure. Both irons had a higher trajectory than my gamer 7 iron. Neither sole dug onto the turf either. The lofts for both irons are a degree or two stronger than mine, so I would think they probably flew a little further than my gamers. Neither iron flew “too” high, however. Might be a little harder to hit knock down shots, though.

Final thoughts: I had hit both the M1 and M2 irons last year during a fitting day, but did not like either. This year’s model were both better in my eyes. I asked a fellow member at our club to hit both and he felt the M1 was his preferred model, and he is a 20-index player. So coming from both a single digit, and a high double-digit, the M1 won this battle of wills. I will try and see if I can locate both a 5 iron and 9 iron to see if a full set might be a winner for me.

I was surprised that the M2 was the winner in this brief session. It felt better, flew higher, easier to hit and about 1/2 club longer that my gamer Apex CF16. The feel/sound was better than I thought it might be, but really not up to the CF16. I could, however, easily game the M2’s.

Feel: I hit the M2 first, and found it to be very solid when hit on the screws. There was almost no feel off the club face at all. When I mishit it, you knew it was, but it wasn’t harsh at all. Hit the M1 next, and same type of feel when hit solid. Much more harsh when mishit though, but I knew that was coming.

Distance and performance: This is was where I was curious to see how they would play. The M2 went out high in the air, and just kept going forever. Now granted my eyesight isn’t that great anymore, but it looked like I got about 10-15 yards more from the M2 compared to my Wilson D300. The only thing I didn’t like about the M2 was how much I was able to turn it over. Got a lot more hook compared to my D300. Don’t know if that was from the REAX shaft, but would love to find a less spinning shaft to correct that.

The M1 wasn’t a great performer for me. Same height as the M2, but much straighter off the club face. Didn’t get any great distance advantage as compared to my D300.  Can’t game a player’s iron anymore, and testing this one just reaffirmed that.

Final thoughts: Was very happy with the distance I gained with the M2 compared to my current gamer. Very good-performing iron for me, and something I would definitely consider changing them out if I could reduce the spin off the face. If you’re looking for more distance, you need to try these out.  The M1 just wasn’t for me, but as a player’s iron, I can see it as a great option.

Like the other testers, I found the M2 to launch the ball much higher and is 10-to-15 yards longer than my Adams XTD forged 7 iron. Of the two 7 irons I prefer the M1. I like the design of the M1 and its visual appearance at address. I feel more confident in trying to work the ball with the M1. The M1 gave me more feedback as to where the club head was in relation to my swing plane. If I had my druthers I would put the M1 in the bag as it stands now. Will continue to test, what a treat to compare the two irons.

Once I started making solid contact with a decent shoulder turn, the M2 really came alive in my hands. Towering flat height, for me, and very long. No more clacky hollow feel, just a very mild pleasant sensation… then zoom. Once I started making better swings, back to the M1, which was a very nice iron. Shorter than the M2 (though not short) and a little lower ball flight. Felt nice and substantial without being heavy. Very forgiving on slight mishits.

But the M2 was the star for me. High trajectory and very long. Club felt lively and fun. Frankly, unless a player wanted a lower trajectory, or likes to hit a lot of knock downs or feel shots, I don’t know why anyone wouldn’t choose the M2. They are very attractive and a very fun iron. I think folks who say that the M2 feels and/or sounds clicky, clacky or hollow may be mishitting the iron toward the toe. I am not judging — I mishit a lot of shots at first. I agree on toe mishits the iron did not feel great. It almost felt like plastic. The ball still flew pretty well, but it wasn’t a very enjoyable experience. Not painful, just felt very dead. But when hit nearer the center, the iron felt fantastic. Light, springy and very lively. 

They are both good-looking clubs. Not too long heel to toe and toplines were not that distracting. M1 is more what I like to see shape wise, but M2 was not bad at all. Personally, not a fan of seeing the face slots. But I could see how some people may like how they frame the ball. 

– Has a very odd sound on contact, almost sounds a tad like a fairway wood “ting. Not a fan – Looks very good at address with the brushed finish – Most shots I hit with it seemed to fall out of the sky (very likely a lack of spin). Ball flight was much lower than I would have expected (not super low, just not much different than my 7 iron) – Inconsistent misses. Next to no distance gains vs RocketBladez Tour 7 iron

– Doesn’t look as good at address as the M1. Chrome finish at address is  not  an issue in even direct sunlight for me – Feels and sounds quite nice to my ears at impact. Not a classic sound but very good considering what type of club it is – Ball flight is very strong (comes off hot). Ball stays high in the air for awhile. Very high and lands soft – 10-12 yards longer on average vs my 7 iron, it even had the horsepower to hang with my 6 iron – VERY forgiving on thin strikes. Couldn’t believe how a near-top still traveled to nearly the front edge in the air and still went as far as the M1 did on a good strike – Shaft is too light

Even though I’m a 2-handicap and don’t fit the M2 “mold,” I could see myself playing this club from 4-6 iron (although gapping would be a major issue mixing these with almost anything else) if it had a heavier shaft in it (I can only imagine how far this 4 iron must go… yikes)

M1 = 2.5/5 stars M2 = 4.5/5 stars

Visual first impressions:  The M1 7-iron is visually appealing to me as far as the finish and overall look. Even though it is classified as a player’s iron, it doesn’t seem so tiny that it would be tough to hit. I am not a huge fan of the bright-yellow badging, but I probably could get over it. The iron inspires confidence with its topline and a little bit of offset. The “rubber” piece on the hosel is a little bit funky to me.

I thought the M2 7-iron would look clunkier than it really is. Besides the finish being a little bit different, the difference between the M1 and M2 is actually pretty small. The M2’s topline and sole are a touch wider, but not by much. Not a huge fan of the fluted hosel since it can be seen at address. The M1’s fluting is only on the rear of the club.

I did notice that the sole’s finish did scratch pretty easily. Overall, I thought the M1 and M2 are pretty good looking, but I would definitely give the edge to the M1. I also preferred the stock Lamkin grip on the M1 vs. the ribbed M2 grip.

On course action:  They both feel solid. I tried hitting both irons in all different types of on-course situations over a two week period. Both clubs launch the ball high but I would not say they balloon. For me, the M2 was about 10 yards longer and higher than the M1. Compared to my Cleveland irons, they are 1 to 1.5 clubs longer.

M1 loft = 30.5 M2 loft = 28.5 Cleveland TA7 loft = 33.5

I know this accounts for the distance gain but the ball definitely comes off hot compared to my set. I was hoping I would hit the M1 better since I like the appearance better, but that was not the case. The M2 definitely felt better for me and I felt more confident with it in my hands.

Discussion: Read all 75 reviews and the responses in our Testing Thread

Tour pro calls Anthony Kim a ‘f*****g idiot’ following Instagram comeback post

John Daly stuns fans into silence with brutal opening tee shot on PGA Tour Champions

Things got heated at the Houston Open between Tony Finau and Alejandro Tosti. Here’s why

Anthony Kim WITB 2024 (February)

This Rory McIlroy post-round ‘The Match’ moment is going viral…but all is likely not what it seems

Scottie Scheffler WITB 2024 (March)

Photos from the 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational

Anthony Kim’s speculated LIV Golf sign-on fee may surprise you

The total sum that Sergio Garcia needs to pay in fines if he wants to return to DP World Tour revealed

Joaquin Niemann names 3 PGA Tour events he’d love to play each year ‘in a perfect world’

Kevin Chappell WITB 2024 (April)

Kevin Chappell what’s in the bag accurate as of the Valero Texas Open. More photos from the event here. Driver:...

Raul Pereda WITB 2024 (April)

Raul Pereda what’s in the bag accurate as of the Texas Children’s Houston Open. More photos from the event here....

Rickie Fowler WITB 2024 (April)

Rickie Fowler what’s in the bag accurate as of the Valero Texas Open. More photos from the event here. Driver: Cobra...

Callum McNeill WITB 2024 (April)

Callum McNeill what’s in the bag accurate as of the Texas Children’s Houston Open. More photos from the event here....

2-time major champ announces shock retirement from the sport at age of 33

Charlie Woods finds it tough going on American Junior Golf Association debut

Edoardo Molinari reveals the latest PGA Tour golfer to turn down ‘good offer’ from LIV Golf

Report: Tiger Woods has ‘eliminated sex’ in preparation for the 2024 Masters

Scottie Scheffler had an interesting response when asked how he ‘quiets the noise’ following Players victory

Jon Rahm dealt fresh blow to hopes of qualifying for 2025 Ryder Cup

Review: Ping Tour-S Rustique Wedges

The new Tour-s Wedge have a new tuning port in the cavity which is very similar to the S56 irons.  (see Review here).  This tuning port Ping uses to create a cast club with excellent feel.  They also redistribute the weight to the perimeter for some forgiveness in a wedge.  The design, feel and over all play made me forget that these have conforming grooves.

I ordered a 52* 56* and 60* with KBS shafts to match the S56 irons.  They all have similar grinds which are on the moderate side.  I believe you can get more aggressive grind from the Ping WRX department.  They all have a great shape, and aggressive, yet conforming grooves.  I was also please with how they dug just a little but no huge divots.

 The 52* gap wedge served me well.  I was able to use it most on full shots, but from time to time to keep trajectory down on chips.  While the grind isn’t overly aggressive, I still found it to be fairly versatile.  I found this to be my 110 club every time I needed it.

The 56* is primarly my sand wedge.  This club too didn’t have any fancy grind, but it just worked.  It was able to escape the sand easily and typically with good spin.  I had many sand saves with this wedge.  I did use it too from the fairway at 100 yards.  I had very good trajectory and distance control with this wedge.

 The 60* does everything else.  I use it on full shots at 90 yards and everything inside of that.  I was really happy with this wedge even though the grind was similar to the other 2 wedges.  I could still open it up and hit the flop.  The leading edge was sharp enough to cut through the rough to extricate a ball, but didn’t dig too much on tight lies.

I was really impressed with the amount of spin that all three wedges offered.  I have sets of both non-conforming and conforming grooves.  While there is some difference I didn’t notice it much with these.  They are sharp and spin the ball nicely.   While I didn’t have many spin back, I wasn’t dealing with much roll out either.  I just always felt in control of the spin.

 Rust is a good thing on these Ping Tour-S wedges .  They look great, offer a non-glare finish and spin the ball very nicely.  For cast wedges they even felt pretty good.  

Check the price online here

For more information:  www.ping.com

Quick Hits +Cast yet good feel +Great spin for CC grooves +Versatile wedge +Oil Can/Rustique Finish

–Minimal grind

You are now an official member of IGR. Keep an eye out for the perks.

No spam, ever. 🔒

About Us   Submit Your Product Contact

Full Disclosure Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions

© 2024 Independent Golf Reviews

SportApprove

Ping tour-s wedge review: the perfect choice for golf tours [updated apr 2024].

Are you an avid golfer who loves to explore different courses and play in tournaments? Then you understand that having the right equipment can make a significant difference in your game. When it comes to wedges, the Ping Tour-S wedge is an excellent choice for anyone who wants precision, consistency, and performance.

In this article, we’ll provide an in-depth Ping Tour-S wedge review to help you make an informed buying decision. We’ll discuss the features, benefits, and drawbacks of this wedge, along with real-world feedback from golfers who have used it. So, without further ado, let’s dive in.

What is the Ping Tour-S Wedge?

The Ping Tour-S wedge is a golf club designed to help golfers excel in short game situations. It’s specifically engineered to offer players more control and precision, allowing them to make precise shots from difficult lies. The wedge is available in several lofts, including 54, 56, 58, and 60 degrees, so you can choose the one that best suits your needs.

Features of the Ping Tour-S Wedge

One of the standout features of the Ping Tour-S wedge is the precision-milled grooves that provide excellent spin and control. The wedge also has a tungsten toe weight that helps to increase the club’s moment of inertia, which provides better stability on off-center hits. Additionally, the wedge has a hydropearl chrome finish that reduces friction with grass and sand , which allows for more consistent shotmaking.

Benefits of the Ping Tour-S Wedge

The Ping Tour-S wedge offers several benefits that can help golfers improve their short game . For starters, the wedge provides excellent distance control, allowing you to make accurate shots from any distance. The precision-milled grooves also provide excellent spin and stopping power, which can help you get the ball closer to the pin. Additionally, the hydropearl chrome finish helps to reduce friction, which can lead to more consistent shots from the rough or sand.

Drawbacks of the Ping Tour-S Wedge

While the Ping Tour-S wedge is an excellent club , it does have a few potential drawbacks. One is that it’s relatively expensive compared to other wedges on the market. Additionally, some golfers may find that the tungsten toe weight makes the club feel slightly heavier than other wedges , which could affect their swing. Finally, the hydropearl chrome finish may wear off over time, which could affect the club’s performance.

Real-World Feedback from Golfers

To get a sense of how the Ping Tour-S wedge performs in practice, we scoured online reviews and forums to see what real golfers had to say. Overall, most golfers were impressed with the wedge’s performance, noting that it provided excellent control and spin. Some golfers also appreciated the club’s consistent feel and sound, which helped to build confidence on the course. However, some golfers did note that the club’s price was a bit steep, and some felt that it was too heavy for their liking.

After reviewing the Ping Tour-S wedge, we can confidently say that it’s an excellent choice for golfers who are serious about their short game . This club offers exceptional precision, spin, and distance control, making it a reliable tool to have in your bag. While it may be a bit pricey, its performance and durability make it worth the investment. So, if you’re looking for a reliable wedge for your golf tour, be sure to check out the Ping Tour-S wedge today!

Auto Amazon Links: No products found.

Callaway Golf Fairway 14 Stand Bag

Titleist TruFeel Golf Balls (One Dozen)

Orlimar ATS Junior Boys' Red/Black Series Individual Golf Clubs (Ages 9-12)

THIODOON Golf putters for Men and Women 2 Pack Two-Way Kids Putter Mini Golf Putter for Right or Left Handed Golfers Adjustable Length Golf Putter Suitable for Children, Teenagers and Adults

Callaway Golf MD5 Jaws Wedge

Recent posts.

• Granite Quiver Tool Roll Bag for Gravel, Road and Mountain Bike, Roll Up Tool Bag with Dial Lock-In System for Attaching Anywhere on Bike, Bike Storage Bag for Bike Tool Kit Review
• Bike Saddle Bag, Waterproof Bike Under Seat Pack Rear Bag Pannier Storage Bag Mountain Road MTB Bicycle EVA PU Saddle Bag, Bicycle Repair Tools Pocket Pack Cycling Pouch with Reflective Stripe Review
• LEZYNE Review
• SILCA SEAT Capsule Premio | Bike Bag w/BOA Closure System|Waterproof YKK Zipper | Bicycle Seat Saddle Bag | Bike Storage Bag | Bike Pouch | bike seat bag | bike bags under seat | saddle bag bicycle Review
• ROCKBROS Bike Saddle Bags with Water Bottle Pouch Waterproof Bike Bags Under Seat Pack for Mountain Road Bike Saddle Bag Bicycles Storage Bag 1.6L Review

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address

• FAIRWAY WOODS
• ACCESSORIES
• GOLF COURSES

Ping Tour Wedges

Ping tour wedges .

• High performance wedge
• Classic looks
• Compact head
• Rounded sole
• Center of gravity

USER REVIEWS

This article is truly amazing! I am very impressed with the depth of insight presented and the clear and easy-to-understand writing style. The content of the article is very relevant and informative, providing a deeper understanding of the topic discussed. In addition, the analysis presented is also very profound and provides a different perspective. Thanks to the writer for the effort and dedication in presenting high-quality articles like this. I am looking forward to reading more articles! Read more on: Arta4d

Wonderful Article! tstoto tstoto tstoto tstoto

Whether it's about performance, design, or any particular aspect that stood out to you, additional details could be helpful for others who may be considering the same product. If you have any specific questions or if there's anything else you'd like to discuss, feel free to let me know in tstoto

No weaknesses. All very good.

I feel real confident saying that if you are a 15+ hdcp, currently playing progressive offset, cavity-backed, perimeter weighted irons and need more distance, this is an extremely viable option. long distance towing

than I have in months. Best of all, I got these on ebay, in like new condition, for 120 bucks with the stock stiff shaft and grips. Great sticks. Greensboro truck brake service

Play Ping I10 irons and Ping wedges. the Wedges are great soft comfortable feel easy to hit nice spin. But the weight in the back has a tendency to pop out and the wedge is no good because of the loss of balance. An inconvenience and not expected from a top of the line company.

Customer Service

Ping Customer Service is great about repairs and takes on the shipping charges.

Similar Products Used:

Mizuno, Nike

Solid performing wedges. Feel is somewhat muted compared to other brands manufactured with soft carbon steel. Consistent and fairly accurate. Good spin control without being too excessive. A great deal if you can find them cheap but I'd look for something with more feedback if you can afford it. The z-65 shaft is really stiff and dampens alot of the feel (which I have in the 52deg and have since sold) but the TT shafts in my 56 and 60 are a nice complement. Nice wedges but a little pricey when purchased new.

Great - no one customizes better

Cleveland, Callaway, Nike, TM, Cobra, Titleist etc

The ping wedge is a great wedge for those who need great distance comtrol. This wedge spins alot aswell helping it to stop quicker. This particular wedge is very easy to get off the ground and into the air. A great buy, worth testing atleast :)

I always had struggled with my wedge game but not after picking these up. I extended mine 1 1/4 inches because of my height and WOW!!! I can play delicated shots around the green and hit soft 80 yd shots with the 58 like i never have been able to in the past. My game has improved by leaps and bounds due to my ability to use these in my short game. i am now playing in the low to mid 70 the last 10 rounds and am just getting better. Great sticks!

Never Needed

Wilson, Vokey, Cleveland, Tour edge

Very forgiving wedge lets you focus on alignment rather than contact as this wedge will cut or bounce off the turf what ever you ask it to do, once you are any way competent with a wedge. Easy to use for delicate chips off tight lies. Hard to get action from short shots will run out a little more than some other brands.

no dealings

2009 vokey 58 deg

Hot Deals See All Hot Deals >>

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

golfreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com

A Comprehensive Discussion of the Ping Tour 65 Shaft

Finding a shaft that fits your playing style is crucial in golf! Whether the shaft is extra stiff or has a bit more flex, understanding how it affects your playing style makes the biggest difference. 

When it comes to the Ping Tour 65 shafts, they have a few options. You’ll need to look deeper to understand if the shaft is right for you! The flex, material, weight, grip, and playing style will all play a big role when choosing the right shaft. 

And to help you with that, in today’s article, we’ll give you a comprehensive and in-depth review of the Ping Tour 65 Shaft! So, let’s get right into it. 

Overview Of The Ping Tour 65 Shaft  

The Ping Tour 65 can be one of the better options when choosing a good driver. But as we mentioned, a shaft that fits your playing style is crucial for the best golfing experience possible. 

The Ping Tour 65 will give you all three common shaft flex options: Stiff, X-Stiff, and Regular Flex.

The stiffer shafts will go lower and spin less, while less stiff will help you hit higher, and the driver will feel much lighter too! 

However, lighter shafts usually make it harder to transition. So, a good middle ground would be to go for a regular flex shaft.

Transition and tempo matter a lot in golfing. So, if you usually struggle with transitioning, a stiffer shaft may be your better option. 

1. Material 

The material on a driver shaft plays an important role in increasing swing speed, distance, and overall performance.

Fortunately, the Ping Tour 65 shaft comes in two different materials, making choosing the right one for your playing style easier. 

The shaft comes in both graphite and steel options. The graphite version focuses on increasing swing speed, while the steel version helps with balance and accuracy. 

The graphite version of the Ping Tour 65 shaft will be a better choice if you want to attain better distance. 

2. Weight 

The weight of your driver shaft is one of the key factors while determining swing speed, transition point, and flex.

Stiffer shafts usually weigh more, while lighter shafts provide more flex. More about this in the next point.

The good thing about the Ping Tour 65 shaft is that it comes in three different weight options! Making it very easy to choose the right one for your playing style. 

As we mentioned, lighter shafts have more flex, and stiffer shafts have less. Now, flex is crucial when choosing the right shaft for you.

But deciding on whether you should go with a lighter, more flex, or heavier, stiffer shaft depends on your playing style. 

The easy explanation is if you have a slow swing speed, go with a lighter shaft with more flex.

A lighter shaft will help you transition more accurately. In contrast, go with a stiffer shaft if you have a faster swing! 

The Ping Tour 65 offers three different options regarding the flex options. Try all three out and get the shaft that compliments your swing! 

4. Torque 

Torque plays an essential role for the golf driver after the swing. The lesser torque your driver shaft has, the lesser twisting you’ll experience.

Thankfully the Ping Tour 65 shaft has a torque of a minimum of 3.4° and goes as high as 4.3°. Which is still quite low! 

This makes the shaft quite resistant to unnecessary twisting and keeps the hit and swing accurate throughout.

5. Bend Point 

The ping tour 65 shafts have great torque, flex, weight, and a very satisfying bend point. The bend point plays a role in the launch angle of the ball’s flight.

While torque helps the ball maintain a steady line, the bend point helps the ball reach the desired distance. 

The Ping Tour 65 shaft has a mid-low bend point, which provides accurate and steady hits!

Ping Tour 65 Shaft Specification Chart 

To help you choose the right shaft for your Ping Tour 65 even more quicker, here is a chart that shows all the important specifications: 

Which Ping Tour 65 Shaft Is Right For You?

Now that you know the shaft options Ping Tour 65 offers, it’s time to find out which of these shafts is right for you. While the flex, weight, and launch angle play a part, what’s more important is your playing style. 

1. Stiff and X-Stiff Shaft 

If you have a slower swing speed, we suggest getting a more lofted driver with more flex and a higher launch angle to optimize distance and accuracy.

The Ping Tour 65 has two options regarding stiffer shafts. If your swing speed requires a heavier option, go for the X-stiff shaft. 

2. Regular Stiff Shaft 

If you have a faster swing speed, you should choose a stiffer shaft for a better grip and transition.

The Ping Tour 65 only has one option for more flex, titled regular flex. The standard stiff shaft may work well if you want a low-mid flex shaft. 

A good driver paired with a good shaft will keep the ball straight and accurate to the target while optimizing the distance. But choosing a shaft that doesn’t match your playing style will hinder that!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

To round up today’s topic, here are some frequently asked questions. These questions will help clear any remaining questions you may have about the Ping Tour 65 Shafts! 

Which Ping Tour 65 Shaft Is The Best For Beginners? 

For beginners, the normal stiff shaft is the best. Most beginners don’t have great transitions due to a lack of experience. And lighter shafts or less stiff shafts can make it harder to maintain a good transition while hitting the ball. At the same time, X-stiff shafts may be too perfect for controlling. 

Is The Launch Angle On A Ping Tour 65 Shaft Good? 

The launch angle on the Ping Tour 65 is good. But the shafts may vary depending on what type of launch angle, ball spin, and distance you’re looking to achieve. For example, the X-stiff offers a very low launch angle mainly because of its weight. But the hit is usually much straighter and more accurate if hit correctly. 

Is The Ping Tour 65 Stock Shafts Good? 

The Ping Tour 65 Driver has three very good stock shaft options, unlike many other companies. All three shafts offer good pliability and are sturdy! So, you won’t be facing many problems with replacing shafts. 

Conclusion 

For a driver, a shaft is an essential part. While the Ping Tour 65 is a great driver, unless you choose the right shaft, your playing experience won’t be that great! 

We would suggest gripping and trying all three shafts to get a feel. But an easy way to decide would be to choose a mid-stiff flex shaft to get the best out of your hits. 

But understanding the factors that make or break a shaft can help you decide which shaft to get much more easily. And we hope this article on the Ping Tour 65 shafts helped you with that!

Are Project X Wedge Shafts Right For You? Find Out Here

Changing Shaft On Adjustable Driver – A To Z Explanation

Mitsubishi Tensei AV Blue Vs Hzrdus Smoke Shaft Comparison

True Temper Elevate 95 Vs 105: Which Golf Shaft to Choose?

Meet Jalal, a passionate golf writer and the driving force behind Golfertroop.com, your go-to destination for all things golfing! Whether you’re a seasoned golfing veteran or a beginner taking your first swing, Jalal is here to assist you in making the most out of your golfing experience.

Similar Posts

Comparing Mizuno MP 59 vs 69: Which Iron is Right for You?

Mizuno is amongst the heavyweights when it comes to premium golf club makers. They released two models of irons in the same timeframe, and those…

Are Tour Edge Golf Clubs Good? Exploring the Quality & Performance

Tour Edge is famous in the market for providing high-quality golf clubs according to the player’s interests. This company has undoubtedly created its own name…

M Grind vs. S Grind Wedges: A Comprehensive Discussion

Among different Grind types for wedges, the M-type and S-type grinds are the most popular. These wedges’ components help improve turf contact and enhance ball…

Why Are Scotty Cameron Putters So Expensive? [Explained]

Starting from beginners to professionals, most golfers prefer the Scotty Cameron putters as their primary putter because of their fame and reputation over the years….

The new Project x wedge shafts addition can be an ideal choice for both newbies and pro golfers. But its features and technology are different…

TaylorMade M1 vs PSi Irons: Which One Is Right For You?

TaylorMade M1 vs PSi Irons, Which one is right for you? According to our in-depth research, the PSi irons are comparatively better than the M1….

Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 Shaft Review By A Pro Golfer

I wanted to play better golf, so I decided to try the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft and I hoped it would help me hit the ball further and straighter. In this review, I’ll tell you about my experience with this special golf shaft and I’ll explain what it’s made of, how it felt, and whether it really made a big difference in my golf game.

Table of Contents

What are the features of the ping tour 2.0 chrome 65 shaft .

The Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft is a premium golf shaft renowned for its cutting-edge features. Designed to cater to the needs of better players, it offers a range of performance-enhancing characteristics that provide both distance and control. Let’s delve into these standout features in detail.

01. High-Modulus Carbon Fiber Material

The shaft is crafted from high-modulus carbon fiber, a material known for its exceptional strength-to-weight ratio. This construction imparts the shaft with both strength and lightness. The result is a shaft that’s stiff enough to provide stability during your swing without burdening your club with unnecessary weight.

02. Stiffness

The stiffness of this shaft is a standout feature. Its rigidity ensures that the shaft maintains its shape during your swing. This stability is crucial for better players as it minimizes flex, delivering a consistent and powerful response when striking the ball.

03. Unique Design for Reduced Torque

The shaft’s design is engineered to minimize torque or twisting during your swing. When a shaft twists excessively, it can lead to errant shots. By reducing this twisting motion, the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft enhances accuracy, helping you consistently hit your target.

04. Low Launch

This shaft is purposefully designed for a low launch trajectory. When you tee off or take long iron shots, a low launch can be advantageous, especially in windy conditions. It keeps the ball flight down, making it less susceptible to the negative effects of wind and increasing overall shot stability.

05. Increased Clubhead Speed

The shaft’s design also aims to boost clubhead speed. A faster clubhead speed can translate into longer shots because it generates more kinetic energy. By promoting a quicker swing, this shaft helps you maximize the distance you achieve with each swing.

In summary, the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft incorporates these features to cater to better players seeking a combination of stability, accuracy, and distance. The use of advanced materials, stiffness, reduced torque, and a low launch profile are all strategically employed to optimize golfers’ performance on the course.

What are the specs of the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft?

It is not enough to talk about a golf club without knowing its exact specs. So here’s a table summarizing the specs of the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft, along with a brief description:

This table presents a comprehensive breakdown of the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft’s specifications, offering clear explanations for each characteristic.

The Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft is a high-performance option for better players seeking maximum distance and control. It comes in three weight options, offering flexibility to match your swing. 

With a low torque rating, this shaft provides stability and minimizes twisting during the swing. Its standard tip and butt diameters make it compatible with most drivers and fairway woods. While it’s available in a standard length of 45 inches, it can be customized to suit your specific needs. Constructed from high-modulus carbon fiber, it combines strength and lightness to offer stability and excellent feel.

Ping tour 2.0 chrome 65 shaft review; Complete review

As we’ve discussed, the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft has garnered significant attention in the golfing world, hailed as a game-changer for better players seeking maximum performance. Now it is the time to review each of the factors of this golf shaft,, just for you. Here  we explore its design, performance, and the benefits it offers, helping you determine if it’s the right choice for your game.

01. Performance

The Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft is a golf club component designed for players seeking more distance and control. It’s known for its stiffness and unique design, made from strong but lightweight materials.

• Hits Far : This shaft helps you hit the ball a long way. It’s like getting an extra boost in distance.
• Hits Straight : It’s good at keeping your shots on target, which means fewer balls going off-course.
• Feels Steady: When you swing, it doesn’t wobble much, so you can hit the ball more consistently.
• Very Stiff: Some people find it hard to bend, making it challenging for those with slower swings.
• Not for Everyone : It might not suit all types of golfers or swing styles.
• Not Beginner-Friendly : If you’re new to golf, this shaft could be tough to handle because of its stiffness.

In summary, the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft can help you hit long and straight shots, but it’s stiff and may not be the best choice for beginners or golfers with slower swings.

The Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft is a golf club component made for players looking for good feedback and control. It’s built with strong materials to provide a solid feel during your swing.

• Solid Feel: This shaft gives you a strong sense of what’s happening with the clubhead, helping you understand your swing better.
• Control: It helps you steer the ball where you want it to go, making it easier to aim accurately.
• Consistency: The solid feel ensures your shots have a consistent quality, which is essential for better golfing.
• Not Very Forgiving: If you don’t hit the ball right, you’ll feel it, which can be frustrating for some golfers.
• May Not Suit All: It might not be the best choice for golfers who prefer a softer, more forgiving feel.
• Not for Beginners: If you’re new to golf, it could be challenging to get used to the strong feedback.

In short, the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft provides a solid feel that helps with control and consistency. However, it’s less forgiving and may not be the right fit for everyone, especially beginners.

Bridgestone Extra Soft Golf Balls: Everything You Need To Know sporticmedia.com

03. Build quality 

The Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft is a golf club part built really well. It’s made strong and put together carefully to handle golf swings.

• Strong and Durable : This shaft is tough and can handle many swings without breaking, making it reliable for the long haul.
• Stable Performance: It keeps performing consistently over time, ensuring your shots stay accurate.
• Dependable : Golfers can trust it to work well each time they play, providing peace of mind.
• Limited Flex Options : It may not fit every golfer’s swing style, which can be a drawback.
• Not for Beginners: It’s designed for more skilled players, so beginners may find it challenging to use.
• Cost : The top-notch build quality can come with a higher price tag.

In short, the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft is really well-made and dependable, but it may not suit everyone’s swing style, especially beginners, and it can be a bit expensive.

04. Reliability 

The Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft is a golf club part made to last. It’s built strong to handle swings and impacts on the golf course.

• Tough and Durable : This shaft is built to take a beating and can withstand the rigors of the game, making it reliable for the long run.
• Consistent Performance : It maintains its performance over time, ensuring that your shots remain reliable and accurate.
• Dependable : Golfers can count on it to perform consistently round after round, providing peace of mind.
• Limited Flexibility: It may not suit all swing styles, limiting its suitability for some golfers.
• Not for Everyone : It’s designed for better players, so beginners might find it challenging to use effectively.
• Cost : The reliability comes at a price, making it a bit expensive for some golfers.

In summary, the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft is a durable and dependable choice for golfers seeking consistent performance. However, it may not be suitable for beginners or those with specific swing preferences, and it’s relatively pricey.

Super Stroke Putter Grip Size Chart; Everything You Need To Know sorticmedia.com

Will I choose Chrome 65 shaft if I had to make a selection?

As a professional golfer, choosing the Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 shaft would be a strong consideration. Its reputation for delivering both distance and control aligns perfectly with the demands of professional play. However, my decision would hinge on a meticulous analysis of my swing speed, strength, and specific playing conditions. I’d also seek the guidance of a trusted club fitter or coach to ensure the shaft’s suitability for my game at the elite level.

Discover the meticulous and expert-driven process behind our product reviews at Sportic Media. Our comprehensive guide, led by industry veterans, ensures you get the most reliable and detailed insights into golf equipment. Dive into our methodical approach by visiting How We Test Products at Sportic Media: A Comprehensive Guide .

Willie Park is a golf writer and content manager at Sportic Media. He covers all aspects of the golf world, from tournament recaps to player profiles to equipment reviews. Willie brings years of experience in the golf industry to his writing, along with a passion for the game and its history. As content manager, Willie oversees Sportic Media's golf coverage, working with writers and editors to produce engaging and informative articles for golf fans everywhere. His mission is to share his love of the game through Sportic Media's high-quality golf journalism.

Similar Posts

Ping G710 vs G425; Must Read Comparison

Regarding golf equipment, Ping has always been at the forefront of innovation and performance. In the world of golf clubs, two popular models from Ping that often find themselves in the spotlight are the Ping G710 and the Ping G425. These irons are designed to provide golfers with exceptional performance and playability, but they have…

Ping AWT 2.0 Shaft Review; A Pro Golfer’s Review

The game of golf is all about precision and fine-tuning your equipment to suit your unique swing characteristics. One essential component that significantly impacts your performance is the golf shaft. In this article, we will delve into the intricacies of the AWT 2.0 shaft and explore its features, performance benefits, player compatibility, pros and cons,…

Titleist TSI3 Driver Settings Chart; Everything You Need To Know

The Titleist TSI3 driver is one of the most famous drivers in the market as it gives a better feel as well as its reliability. But before buying a TSI3 driver, it is very important to take a look at its driver settings chart to make sure that the driver fulfils your needs or not….

Callaway X2 Hot Driver Adjustment Chart: Fine-Tune Your Golf Game

Golf is a sport of precision and skill, where even the slightest adjustments can significantly impact a player’s performance. The Callaway X2 Hot Driver is designed to help golfers achieve maximum distance and accuracy off the tee. Callaway provides a versatile adjustment chart to enhance its performance further, allowing golfers to tailor the club to…

5 Wood Vs 4 Hybrid; All You Need To Know

A 5 wood and a 4 hybrid are golf clubs designed for long shots, but they have distinct differences. The 5 wood offers more distance with a lower loft, suited for experienced golfers with fast swing speeds. Meanwhile, the 4 hybrid provides versatility, forgiveness, and a higher launch, making it ideal for a wider range…

How to Cut a Graphite Shaft? A Complete Guide Just For You 

Quick Guide: To cut a graphite shaft, follow these steps: 1. Mark desired length. 2. Secure the shaft in a vice. 3. Use a graphite shaft cutting tool for a clean cut. 4. Deburr the cut end. 5. Smooth with sandpaper if needed. Remember safety goggles and gloves. Take accurate measurements, cut gradually, and double-check…

One Comment

• Pingback: Titleist DCI Irons Black Vs Gold; Complete Comparison | (February 2024)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Pin It on Pinterest

Overview Of The Ping Tour 65 Shaft – Performance, Customization, And Reviews

January 10, 2024

Explore the Ping Tour 65 Shaft, its features, and benefits. Find out how it performs in terms of distance, accuracy, ball flight consistency, control, and feel. Customize the shaft with flex, weight, and grip options. Read professional golfer testimonials and amateur golfer reviews. Choose the right shaft based on your swing speed, playing style, and consult with a club fitter. Learn how to maintain and care for the Ping Tour 65 Shaft properly.

Overview of the Ping Tour 65 Shaft

The Ping Tour 65 Shaft is a high-performance golf shaft designed to enhance your game and take your shots to the next level. With its advanced technology and carefully crafted features, this shaft offers a combination of power, control, and feel that can greatly improve your overall golfing experience.

What is the Ping Tour 65 Shaft?

The Ping Tour 65 Shaft is a premium golf shaft that is part of the popular Ping Tour series. It is specifically designed to provide golfers with increased distance, accuracy, and consistency in their shots. Made from high-quality materials and engineered with precision, this shaft is suitable for golfers of all skill levels.

Features of the Ping Tour 65 Shaft

The Ping Tour 65 Shaft is packed with features that contribute to its exceptional performance on the golf course. Here are some of its notable features:

• High-Quality Materials : The shaft is constructed using top-grade materials that ensure durability and longevity. This means that you can rely on the Ping Tour 65 Shaft to perform consistently even after prolonged use.
• Advanced Technology : Ping has incorporated innovative technology into the design of this shaft. The use of advanced materials and engineering techniques allows for optimized energy transfer, resulting in increased clubhead speed and distance.
• Optimal Weight Distribution : The Tour 65 Shaft is carefully engineered to have a balanced weight distribution, which promotes a smooth and consistent swing. This helps golfers achieve greater control and accuracy with their shots.
• Stability and Flexibility : The shaft incorporates a unique combination of stability and flexibility. This ensures that the shaft remains stable during the swing, while providing the necessary flexibility to generate power and maximize distance.

Benefits of the Ping Tour 65 Shaft

Investing in the Ping Tour 65 Shaft offers golfers a range of benefits that can significantly improve their performance on the course. Here are some of the key benefits you can expect:

• Increased Distance : The Ping Tour 65 Shaft is designed to maximize distance off the tee. Its advanced construction and optimized weight distribution help golfers generate greater clubhead speed, resulting in longer drives and increased overall distance.
• Improved Accuracy : With the Ping Tour 65 Shaft, you can expect enhanced accuracy and precision in your shots. The stability and balanced weight distribution of the shaft contribute to a more consistent swing, allowing you to hit your target more consistently.
• Consistency in Ball Flight : One of the standout features of the Ping Tour 65 Shaft is its ability to deliver consistent ball flight. Whether you’re hitting a fade or a draw, this shaft helps you maintain a consistent trajectory, giving you greater control over your shots.
• Control and Feel : The Ping Tour 65 Shaft offers exceptional control and feel, allowing you to shape your shots according to your desired trajectory. It provides the feedback and responsiveness you need to execute shots with precision, giving you a heightened sense of control over your game.

Performance of the Ping Tour 65 Shaft

The Ping Tour 65 Shaft is renowned for its exceptional performance on the golf course. Designed with precision engineering and advanced materials, this shaft offers golfers a winning combination of increased distance, accuracy, consistency in ball flight, and superior control and feel.

Increased Distance and Accuracy

When it comes to maximizing distance and accuracy off the tee, the Ping Tour 65 Shaft delivers outstanding results. Its unique design and construction allow for optimal energy transfer, resulting in explosive power and enhanced clubhead speed. As a result, golfers can experience significant gains in distance, allowing them to reach those long par-5s with ease.

In addition to increased distance, the Ping Tour 65 Shaft also promotes accuracy. The shaft’s stability and low torque ensure minimal twisting during the swing, resulting in straighter and more consistent shots. Whether you’re looking to hit a long and accurate drive or navigate a narrow fairway, this shaft will give you the confidence to do so.

Consistency in Ball Flight

Consistency in ball flight is crucial for golfers of all skill levels, and the Ping Tour 65 Shaft excels in this area. The shaft’s advanced design helps golfers achieve a consistent launch angle and spin rate, resulting in predictable and repeatable shots. This consistency allows for better shot planning and course management, giving golfers a competitive edge.

The Ping Tour 65 Shaft also minimizes dispersion, ensuring that your shots stay on target. Whether you’re shaping a draw or fade, this shaft provides the stability and control needed to execute your desired shot shape consistently. Golfers can trust the Ping Tour 65 Shaft to deliver the same reliable ball flight, shot after shot.

Control and Feel

Control and feel are essential aspects of any golf shot, and the Ping Tour 65 Shaft offers both in abundance. The shaft’s responsive and lively nature provides golfers with a heightened sense of connection to the clubhead, allowing for precise control throughout the swing. This enhanced control translates into better shot shaping and the ability to work the ball around the course with confidence.

Furthermore, the Ping Tour 65 Shaft’s exceptional feel allows golfers to better understand their swing and make necessary adjustments on the fly. The feedback provided by the shaft enables golfers to fine-tune their tempo, timing, and release, resulting in improved shot quality and overall performance.

(Note: The following sections will discuss the , comparisons with other shafts, player reviews and feedback, how to choose the right Ping Tour 65 Shaft, and maintenance and care tips. Keep reading to discover more about this remarkable golf shaft.)

Customization Options for the Ping Tour 65 Shaft

Flex options.

When it comes to choosing the right golf shaft for your game, flexibility is a crucial factor to consider. The Ping Tour 65 Shaft offers a range of flex options to suit different swing speeds and player preferences.

• Regular Flex : The regular flex option is ideal for golfers with a moderate swing speed. It provides a good balance of control and distance, allowing players to achieve consistent ball flight and accuracy.
• Stiff Flex : If you have a faster swing speed and prefer a more aggressive feel, the stiff flex option is worth considering. This option offers enhanced control and a lower trajectory, which can help advanced players optimize their performance.
• Extra Stiff Flex : Designed for players with an exceptionally fast swing speed, the extra stiff flex option provides maximum stability and control. It allows for a more explosive release and can generate incredible distance off the tee.

Choosing the right flex option is essential for maximizing your performance on the golf course. It ensures that the shaft bends and loads correctly during your swing, leading to more efficient energy transfer and greater accuracy. It’s important to note that the flex option that works best for you may vary depending on your swing characteristics and personal preferences. Consulting with a club fitter or trying out different flex options during a fitting session can help you determine the ideal choice for your game.

Weight Options

The weight of a golf shaft can significantly impact your swing and overall performance. The Ping Tour 65 Shaft offers a variety of weight options to cater to different players and swing styles.

• Lighter Weight : If you’re looking to increase your swing speed and generate more distance, opting for a lighter weight shaft might be a good choice. Lighter shafts allow for a faster tempo and can help golfers with slower swing speeds generate more clubhead speed.
• Standard Weight : The standard weight option is a versatile choice suitable for most golfers. It provides a good balance between control, feel, and distance. It’s a popular option for players who want a reliable and consistent performance.
• Heavier Weight : Golfers who have a faster swing speed or prefer a more controlled and stable feel might opt for a heavier weight shaft. Heavier shafts can help promote a smoother tempo and provide added stability during the swing, which can lead to improved accuracy.

Choosing the right weight option requires considering factors such as swing speed, tempo, and personal preferences. It’s essential to find the right balance between control, distance, and feel to optimize your performance on the course.

Grip Options

The grip of a golf club plays a crucial role in maintaining control and stability throughout your swing. The Ping Tour 65 Shaft offers various grip options to ensure that you can customize your club to fit your hand size and personal preferences.

• Standard Grip : The standard grip option is designed to fit the average golfer’s hand size. It provides a comfortable and secure grip, allowing for consistent control and feel.
• Oversized Grip : Golfers with larger hands or those who prefer a more substantial grip may opt for the oversized grip option. It offers enhanced stability and can help reduce unwanted hand movement during the swing.
• Undersized Grip : On the other hand, golfers with smaller hands may benefit from the undersized grip option. It allows for a better connection between your hands and the club, promoting a more controlled and confident swing.

Choosing the right grip option is essential for maintaining a proper grip pressure and maximizing control over the club. It’s important to ensure that your grip feels comfortable and secure, as it directly affects your ability to square the clubface at impact.

Comparing the Ping Tour 65 Shaft to Other Shafts

The Ping Tour 65 Shaft is a remarkable golf shaft that stands out among its competitors. In this section, we will explore how it performs in comparison to other Ping shafts as well as shafts from other golf club manufacturers. We will examine its performance, features, and weigh the pros and cons to help you make an informed decision.

Performance Comparison with Other Ping Shafts

When comparing the Ping Tour 65 Shaft to other shafts in the Ping lineup, it becomes evident why it is highly regarded by both professional and amateur golfers. One noticeable difference is the increased distance and accuracy it offers. The Tour 65 Shaft is specifically designed to provide exceptional power and control, enabling golfers to achieve longer drives while maintaining accuracy. This performance advantage sets it apart from other Ping shafts, making it a popular choice among players looking to improve their game.

Another aspect where the Ping Tour 65 Shaft excels is consistency in ball flight. It helps golfers achieve a more predictable trajectory, which is crucial for optimizing shot placement on the course. Whether you’re hitting a high, towering shot or a low, penetrating drive, the Tour 65 Shaft delivers consistent results, ensuring that your ball flight is reliable and repeatable.

Furthermore, the Ping Tour 65 Shaft offers excellent control and feel. It provides golfers with the ability to shape shots and manipulate the ball flight as desired. The shaft’s responsive nature allows for a heightened sense of connection between the golfer and the club, resulting in improved control over the swing. With the Tour 65 Shaft, you can confidently execute shots with precision and finesse, giving you a competitive edge on the course.

Comparison with Competitor Shafts

When pitted against shafts from other golf club manufacturers, the Ping Tour 65 Shaft continues to shine. Its performance holds up exceptionally well in comparison, making it a top choice for golfers seeking a high-quality shaft.

One notable advantage of the Ping Tour 65 Shaft is its versatility. It caters to a wide range of players, from low handicappers to high handicappers, thanks to its customizable options. Whether you prefer a stiffer or more flexible shaft, the Tour 65 offers various flex options to suit your swing dynamics and playing style. This level of customization sets it apart from many competitor shafts that may not offer the same level of flexibility.

Additionally, the Tour 65 Shaft stands out for its exceptional stability. It minimizes the unwanted twisting and bending that can occur during the swing, resulting in more consistent and accurate shots. This stability factor gives the Ping Tour 65 Shaft an edge over competitor shafts that may lack the same level of control and stability.

Pros and Cons of the Ping Tour 65 Shaft

As with any golf shaft, the Ping Tour 65 Shaft has its share of advantages and considerations to keep in mind. Let’s take a closer look at the pros and cons to help you understand the overall picture.

• Increased distance and accuracy : The Tour 65 Shaft offers exceptional power and control, enabling longer drives and precise shot placement.
• Consistency in ball flight : This shaft provides a predictable trajectory, ensuring reliable and repeatable shot results.
• Control and feel : The responsive nature of the Tour 65 Shaft allows for enhanced control and shot shaping capabilities.
• Versatility : With customizable flex options, the Tour 65 Shaft caters to a wide range of players, making it suitable for various swing dynamics and playing styles.
• Stability : The Tour 65 Shaft minimizes unwanted twisting and bending, resulting in more consistent and accurate shots.

Considerations:

• Price : The Ping Tour 65 Shaft is a premium golf shaft, and the added performance and features come at a higher price point compared to some competitor shafts.
• Customization process : While the shaft offers various customization options , it may require consulting with a club fitter to ensure the best fit for your swing speed and playing style.

Player Reviews and Feedback on the Ping Tour 65 Shaft

The Ping Tour 65 Shaft has received rave reviews from both professional golfers and amateur players alike. Let’s take a closer look at what they have to say about this impressive golf shaft.

Professional Golfer Testimonials

Professional golfers who have tested the Ping Tour 65 Shaft have been extremely impressed with its performance. Many have noted that it provides them with the perfect combination of distance, accuracy, and control.

One professional golfer commented, “The Ping Tour 65 Shaft has completely transformed my game. It has added a few extra yards to my drives while still maintaining incredible accuracy. I can confidently shape my shots and hit the ball exactly where I want it to go.”

Another professional golfer mentioned, “I have tried numerous shafts throughout my career, but the Ping Tour 65 Shaft stands out from the rest. It offers exceptional stability and a smooth feel, allowing me to have complete control over my shots. It has definitely elevated my performance on the course.”

Amateur Golfer Reviews

Amateur golfers who have tested the Ping Tour 65 Shaft have also been highly impressed with its . They have found that it has helped them improve their game and achieve better results on the course.

One amateur golfer shared, “As a mid-handicap player, I was looking for a shaft that could provide me with more distance and consistency. The Ping Tour 65 Shaft delivered on both fronts. I have noticed a significant increase in my driving distance, and my shots have become more accurate. It has given me the confidence to take my game to the next level.”

Another amateur golfer mentioned, “I recently switched to the Ping Tour 65 Shaft, and I couldn’t be happier with the results. It has improved my ball flight and given me a better feel for the club. I have noticed a remarkable improvement in my overall consistency, and my scores have started to drop. It’s a game-changer.”

Common Feedback and Opinions

In addition to the professional golfer testimonials and amateur golfer reviews , there are some common feedback and opinions that have emerged regarding the Ping Tour 65 Shaft.

One common feedback is the shaft’s ability to provide a consistent ball flight. Golfers have praised its stability and the way it minimizes any unwanted shot dispersion. This consistency allows players to have more confidence in their swings and make better tactical decisions on the course.

Another common feedback is the control and feel that the Ping Tour 65 Shaft offers. Golfers have raved about the responsive feedback they receive when striking the ball. The shaft’s design allows for a smooth transfer of energy, resulting in a solid and satisfying impact. This control and feel contribute to improved shot accuracy and overall performance.

Overall, the Ping Tour 65 Shaft has garnered high praise from professional golfers, amateur players, and golf enthusiasts alike. Its impressive performance, including increased distance, accuracy, consistency in ball flight, control, and feel, has made it a top choice for golfers of all skill levels. Whether you’re a professional looking to enhance your game or an amateur golfer striving for improvement, the Ping Tour 65 Shaft is definitely worth considering.

(Disclaimer: The testimonials and mentioned above are fictional and solely created for the purpose of this writing sample.)

How to Choose the Right Ping Tour 65 Shaft

Matching the shaft to your swing speed.

Finding the right golf club shaft that suits your swing speed is crucial for optimizing your performance on the golf course. The Ping Tour 65 Shaft offers various flex options that cater to different swing speeds, allowing you to achieve the perfect balance of power and control.

When it comes to swing speed, there are generally three categories: slow, moderate, and fast. If you have a slower swing speed, a softer flex shaft like the regular or senior flex would be ideal. This allows the clubhead to load more during the swing, generating more power and distance. On the other hand, if you have a faster swing speed, a stiffer flex shaft like the stiff or extra stiff flex would be more suitable. This helps to stabilize the clubhead and maintain control during impact.

To determine your swing speed, you can visit a local golf shop or driving range that offers swing speed analysis. This will give you a better understanding of your swing dynamics and help you make an informed decision when selecting the flex option for your Ping Tour 65 Shaft.

Consulting with a Club Fitter

While swing speed is an important factor in choosing the right shaft, it is not the only consideration. Consulting with a professional club fitter can provide valuable insights into your swing characteristics and assist in determining the best fit for your game.

A club fitter is trained to analyze your swing and gather data such as launch angle, spin rate, and ball speed. This information is crucial in selecting the appropriate shaft flex, weight, and other specifications that will enhance your performance. They will take into account your swing speed, tempo, and release point to recommend the most suitable options from the Ping Tour 65 Shaft lineup.

During a club fitting session, the club fitter may also experiment with different shaft options to fine-tune your performance. This process allows you to try out various combinations and find the perfect match that maximizes your distance, accuracy, and overall control.

Considering Your Playing Style

Apart from swing speed and club fitting, considering your playing style is another important aspect when choosing the right shaft for your game. The Ping Tour 65 Shaft offers customization options in terms of weight and grip, allowing you to further tailor the club to your preferences.

If you prefer a lighter feel and more maneuverability, opting for a lighter weight shaft would be beneficial. This can help increase clubhead speed and generate more distance. On the other hand, if you prefer a heavier feel and more stability, a heavier weight shaft may suit your playing style better. This can provide a more controlled swing and improved accuracy.

Additionally, the grip of the club plays a significant role in how the shaft feels in your hands. The Ping Tour 65 Shaft offers various grip options, allowing you to choose the one that provides the most comfortable and secure grip for you. Whether you prefer a softer or firmer grip, finding the right combination can greatly enhance your overall performance and confidence on the course.

Maintenance and Care Tips for the Ping Tour 65 Shaft

Taking proper care of your Ping Tour 65 Shaft is essential to ensure its longevity and optimal performance on the golf course. By following these maintenance and care tips, you can keep your shaft clean, store it properly, and regularly check for any signs of damage or wear.

Cleaning the Shaft

To maintain the performance and appearance of your Ping Tour 65 Shaft, regular cleaning is necessary. Here are some simple steps to clean your shaft effectively:

• Gather the necessary supplies : You will need a soft cloth or towel, mild soap or golf club cleaner, and water.
• Dampen the cloth : Moisten the cloth or towel with water. Avoid using excessive water as it can seep into the clubhead or grip.
• Apply soap or cleaner : If using mild soap or golf club cleaner, apply a small amount to the damp cloth.
• Wipe the shaft : Gently wipe the shaft from the grip end towards the clubhead. Pay extra attention to remove any dirt, grass, or debris that may have accumulated.
• Rinse and dry : After wiping, rinse the cloth with clean water and remove any soap residue from the shaft. Then, use a dry cloth to thoroughly dry the shaft.

Regular cleaning not only keeps your Ping Tour 65 Shaft looking good but also helps maintain its performance by preventing the buildup of dirt or debris that could affect the club’s aerodynamics.

Storing the Shaft Properly

Proper storage is crucial to protect your Ping Tour 65 Shaft from any potential damage or warping. Follow these guidelines to ensure the shaft remains in optimal condition:

• Use a golf club bag : Invest in a high-quality golf club bag with individual compartments for each club, including the Ping Tour 65 Shaft. This will prevent the shaft from rubbing against other clubs and reduce the risk of scratches or dents.
• Keep the shaft dry : Moisture can damage the shaft, so make sure it is dry before storing it. If your shaft becomes wet during a round of golf, wipe it dry before placing it in the bag.
• Avoid extreme temperatures : Do not expose the shaft to extreme heat or cold for prolonged periods. Extreme temperatures can cause the shaft to expand or contract, potentially leading to structural damage.
• Store in a secure location : When not in use, store your golf bag in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight or areas with high humidity. This will help prevent any potential damage caused by environmental factors.

By storing your Ping Tour 65 Shaft properly, you can prolong its lifespan and maintain its performance for years to come.

Checking for Damage or Wear

Regularly inspecting your Ping Tour 65 Shaft for any signs of damage or wear is crucial to identify potential issues early on. Here are some key areas to check:

• Shaft integrity : Carefully examine the entire length of the shaft for any visible cracks, dents, or splintering. If you notice any structural damage, it is best to consult a professional club fitter or contact Ping for further assistance.
• Grip condition : Inspect the grip for any signs of wear, such as smooth spots or cracks. A worn-out grip can negatively impact your grip, control, and feel during swings. If needed, consider replacing the grip to maintain optimal performance.
• Ferrule condition : The ferrule is the small plastic or metal ring that connects the shaft to the clubhead. Check for any loose or cracked ferrules and ensure they are securely in place.
• Connection points : Pay attention to the connection points between the shaft and clubhead, such as hosel or adapter. Make sure they are tight and free from any visible damage or movement.

Regularly inspecting your Ping Tour 65 Shaft will help you identify any potential issues before they escalate, allowing you to address them promptly and ensure consistent performance on the golf course.

In conclusion, maintaining and caring for your Ping Tour 65 Shaft is essential for optimal performance and longevity. By following these tips, you can keep your shaft clean, store it properly, and regularly check for any signs of damage or wear. By taking good care of your shaft, you can enjoy improved performance, accuracy, and control during your golf games.

You may also like

• Ping G430 LST 3 Wood: Features, Performance, Technology, And Reviews
• Maximizing Distance And Accuracy With The Right Swing Speed Shaft Flex
• True Temper AMT Red: Performance, Technology, And Customization Options
• Enhance Your Putting Game With The Odyssey White Hot Pro Putter
• 14 Way Divider Golf Bag – Features, Benefits, And Top Brands
• Ecco S3 Golf Shoes: Superior Performance And Style For Men And Women
• Most Forgiving Irons For High Handicappers – Top Brands, Reviews, And Tips
• Straight Stick Golf Review – Overview, Features, Performance, And User Reviews
• Best Golf Hats 2023 – Factors To Consider, Top Brands, Styles, And Care Guide
• Popular Brands Of Golf Carts – Yamaha, Club Car, EZ-GO, And More!

As a lifelong golf enthusiast, Stacey E. Black has spent countless hours on the greens, perfecting their swing and studying the sport's rich history. With a passion for sharing their knowledge with fellow golfers, they founded SwingTalks as a platform to offer expert tips, insights, and news about everything related to golf.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

A blog about golf swings, techniques, and tips for golf enthusiasts.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

1976 Wilson Avenue, Scurry, TX 75158

Call Us: +1-972-452-4218

[email protected]

© 2023 SwingTalks • All Rights Reserved

Ping Tour 65 Shaft Review – Specs, Flex, Weight

Some of the most reliable manufacturers have been behind Ping shafts. So much so that used Ping shafts are still a hot commodity.

Perhaps the most notable Ping shaft is the Tour line.

The Ping Tour 65 is a lightweight graphite shaft that allows you to easily adjust loft. I usually don’t do too well with lightweight driver shafts so I was really interested to see what the Ping Tour 65 would do for my swing. Find out everything you need to know about the Ping Tour 65 shaft in the following review.

Ping Tour 65 Shaft Overview

The Ping Tour 65 has an interesting design. It almost doesn’t look like a graphite shaft at all.

It has a reflective finish with very wispy, almost indiscernible “Ping” lettering in the midsection. Somehow it looks nondescript and alluring at the same time.

The Ping Tour 65 has a mid/low bend point. I was surprised at how stable this shaft was given its weight. The bend point isn’t really subtle; but it doesn’t make the shaft feel out of control either. I personally would have liked a stiffer-feeling shaft but I could see why so many players like this one.

It felt very light throughout my swing. I didn’t feel like it was putting a hitch in my backswing. It felt comfortable going up. In the transition, the Ping Tour 65 feels very smooth – no hitches. On my downswing it was fast and I could feel the club head accelerate through the ball. On my follow through, the Ping Tour 65 felt comfortable and not taxing like heavier shafts can be.

Overall it wasn’t a perfect fit for me but it felt really nice. Furthermore, the Ping Tour 65 is likely to be a perfect fit for a lot of slower swing speed players.

Why is the Ping Tour 65 So Popular?

The Ping Tour 65 is still so popular because it is one of the most stable lightweight shafts you can find.

The Ping Tour 65 is also very versatile. The adjustable loft technology allows you to adjust your flight to suit your tempo.

How Does the Ping Tour 65 Perform?

The feel of a shaft is very important because if you aren’t comfortable with how a shaft feels, you won’t swing comfortably.

But the numbers are also very important. Let’s start with spin. The Ping Tour 65 produced spin rates that were consistently in the 2300-2500 RPM range. Not exactly low spinning but subjectively low considering the weight of this shaft.

The spin gave my shots a little more shape than I like off the tee but again, nothing outrageous. For the most part, I was still able to hit my usual draw; but there were a couple of drives that came dangerously close to becoming pulls.

My launch angles were on the steep side; but again, that’s pretty much what I was expecting. I was getting launches at 14+ degrees on a regular basis. The lowest I was able to achieve was 12 degrees. But remember that you can adjust the loft of this shaft.

Now onto the all-important distance. My average carry distance once testing was over was 257.7 yards. I was definitely leaving yards on the table because of the high launch and relatively high spin numbers. But if you are the kind of player who struggles to get the ball up, the launch should be perfect for you.

Shaft Specs

What flexes are available what swing speeds do they suit.

Regular would be a good fit for players in the 70-75 MPH swing speed range. Stiff is good for 76-85 MPH swingers. Extra stiff may be suitable for 86-90 MPH swingers.

What Weights Are Available? What Swing Speeds Do They Suit?

The 55g version would only work for sub 70 MPH swingers. The 65g version should be a good fit for 70-80 MPH swingers. The 75g version may work for 81-85 MPH swingers.

Why is it So Good?

What makes the Ping Tour 65 good in my opinion is that it is fast.

I was getting really good club head speed out of it and I could feel it move through the ball. The Ping Tour 65 should be able to help slow to moderate swingers increase distance.

Ping Tour 65 First Impressions

I liked the fact that the Ping Tour 65 felt light and fast without feeling whippy and unstable.

It’s definitely one of the more controlled shafts at this weight point.

Key Features & Performance

The Ping Tour 65 features a proprietary rib structure which apparently is what gives this lightweight shaft its stability. The special rib structure also helps absorb harsh vibrations.

Ping Tour 65 Driver Review

Off the tee, the Ping Tour 65 produces high launch and moderately low spin numbers. It’s a good option for anyone who wants a high-launching, fast shaft. But it didn’t suit my aggressive swing tempo and 90+ swing speed.

Ping Tour 65 Fairway Wood Review

With my #5 wood, I could feel the shaft flex a bit more. It could have been how I was swinging but the Ping Tour 65 definitely invites you to swing outside of yourself. As a result, the bend point was much more prominent and the spin was higher.

Ping Tour 65 Pros & Cons

• Lightweight design
• Should help players increase swing speed
• Excellent club head speed
• Relatively low spin for such a light shaft
• Smooth feel
• Not good for fast swingers

Overall Score: 95/100

Check out more reviews here:.

Who Should Buy it?

The Ping Tour 65 should definitely be reserved for players who need to get the ball up.

I can see it pairing very well with high handicap players with slow to moderate swing speeds. The Ping Tour 65 would also be a good choice for senior players who might be experiencing slower swing speeds.

Project X Denali Blue 60TX Shaft Review - Specs, Flex, Weight

Fujikura 2024 Ventus Blue Shaft Review - Specs, Flex, Weight

Project X Cypher Vs HZRDUS Smoke Shaft Comparison

Mitsubishi Tensei Vs Project X Cypher Shaft Comparison

Tour AD DI Hybrid Shaft Review - Specs, Flex, Weight

Nippon Modus 105 Vs Project X 5.5 Shaft Comparison

Dynamic Gold X100 Vs Project X 6.5 Shaft Comparison

Project X 6.5 Vs KBS Tour X Shaft Comparison

Nippon 950 Vs Nippon Modus 105 Shaft Comparison

© 2022  Amazon Associates Program. Golf Blue Heron is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. *Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc., or its affiliates.

• Best Golf Products
• Garmin s60 vs Garmin s40 vs Garmin s20
• Golf Driver Comparisons
• Golf Iron Comparisons
• Home Of Golf
• Putt-A-Bout Indoor Putting Mat Review

Ping Tour 65 Shaft Specs: The Ultimate Guide

Selecting the correct golf equipment can help optimize your game and make all the difference.

A significant golf instrument is a shaft, and it hugely impacts the swing speed, accuracy, and distance.

The Ping Tour 65 shaft is a high-performance golf shaft designed to optimize players’ ball flight and increase their distance.

This shaft is popular among players because of its low launch and spin rate, thus delivering maximum distance and accuracy.

If you’ve streamlined your option to the Ping Tour 65 shaft but need clarification on its specifications, this guide is for you.

We will provide you with everything you need about the Ping Tour 65 shaft specs, including weight, flex, torque, bend point, material, and design, to help you determine if it’s the right shaft for your golf game.

Ping Tour 65 Shaft review

No golfer can argue against the popularity of Ping shafts. From the Alta CB to the Tour 65 shafts, Ping is behind some of the most prominent shafts in the market.

The Tour 65 is a sibling of the CB 55 and a precursor to the 75.

With a graphite material and lightweight construction, the shaft is a player’s dream for scoring more distance and better accuracy.

It is available in regular, x stiff, stiff versions, which are enough to cater to a diverse set of golfers. The lowest torque for the Tour 65 is 2.7 (degrees) and the highest is 3.6.

The Ping Tour 65 shaft is for every level of golfer. Whether you’re a beginner or a seasoned pro, it can help optimize your game.

It is designed with premium materials and engineered to offer a stable and consistent ball flight in different conditions.

It is most suitable for players seeking maximum performance and consistency.

Who Makes the Ping Tour 65 Shaft?

While the Ping brand will certainly be called the manufacturer, the real shaft makers are different.

Sort of like outsourced work. In the past, the Tour Shaft line used to be made by UST, a reputable shaft manufacturer.

Currently, it seems that Ping is now using Aldila for the manufacturing of its Tour Shaft.

Ping Tour 2.0 Chrome 65 Shaft and Black 65 Shaft

These shafts are in the same G400 line. Thus, they are similar in configuration with little differences.

Both are manufactured by UST Mamiya and Aldila, both of which are under different parent companies. My understanding is that Ping uses different suppliers to minimize supply issues.

In terms of performance and features, they are quite similar. However, a lot of golfers have found the Chrome to be soft while the Black is stiffer.

In terms of feel many of those who have tested both confirm that Chrome 2.0 has a smoother feeling as against the stouter and stable feeling of Black 2.0. Ping also confirmed this in one of their videos.

Key Specifications

• Flex options: Stiff
• Weight options: 62 grams, 64 grams, or 66 grams
• Torque: 2.8 degrees
• Launch: Low
• Tip diameter: 0.355 inches (tapered)
• Butt diameter: 0.600 inches
• Material: High-quality graphite
• Length: Available in various lengths to fit different clubheads and golfer heights

The exact specifications for the shaft may vary based on the particular version, model and customization options. Let’s expound on the specifications of the Ping Tour 65 shaft.

Shaft Material

The Ping Tour 65 shaft is made from high-quality materials in two different versions – graphite and steel – both delivering consistent feels and performances.

The graphite version is ideal for golfers who want to increase their swing speed and attain optimum distance.

In contrast, the steel version is more suited for golfers who prioritize control and accuracy over distance.

Shaft Weight and Flex

The weight and flex of a golf shaft are two critical factors that can affect your performance on the field.

They are directly related to the tempo and swing speed of the player.

If you have a slower swing speed, you’ll need a lighter and more flexible shaft to help generate more clubhead speed.

However, a heavier and stiffer shaft will be perfect if you have a faster swing speed, as it will help maintain control and accuracy.

Fortunately, the Ping Tour 65 is available in different shaft weights and flex, helping players get the perfect fit.

The Ping Tour 65 shaft is available in three weight options – 55, 65, and 75 grams, and four flex options – regular, stiff, extra stiff, and tour stiff.

As such, it’s a versatile option that caters to a wide range of players and skill levels.

Shaft Torque and Bend Point

Another critical factor is the shaft torque and bend point, which are vital to the ball flight.

The torque of a golf shaft refers to its resistance to twisting during the swing, and a low torque rating means a more stable shaft that produces less spin.

The Ping Tour 65 shaft has a low torque of 3.3, which helps to promote a steady and consistent ball flight.

On the other hand, the bend point signifies the point at which the shaft begins to flex when swinging. It has a mid-low bend point, which provides a lower launch angle for increased distance.

Shaft Design

The unique design of the Ping Tour 65 shaft features is a significant attribute that differentiates it from its peers.

The unique design helps to offer players optimum performance and consistency.

It features Ping’s proprietary rib structure, which helps to stabilize the shaft during the swing and reduce unwarranted vibrations.

The design also incorporates a stiff tip and soft lower midsection that enhances feel and feedback at impact.

Ping Tour 65 Shaft Specs: Pros and Cons

• A stiff tip provides a low launch and less spin, ideal for controlling ball flight.
• Excellent distance and accuracy
• The mid-weight design makes it versatile for players of varying swing speeds and skill levels.
• The low torque rating makes it a stable shaft that delivers consistent ball flight.
• High-performing option for players seeking a low-launch, low-spin ball flight
• The stiffness of the shaft may feel harsh or uncomfortable to some players
• It may not provide the soft, responsive feel that some players prefer
• Not ideal for players seeking a high-launch, high-spin ball flight

Ping Tour 65 vs 75 Shaft: Any Difference?

From those who have both shafts and tested them, they feel the 75 has more weight and more stability compared to the 65.

There is a 10g weight difference between the two, which may or may not be a deal breaker depending on your skills and playing style.

So, if you’re looking for more distance, you may want to go with the lighter one (in this case, the Tour 65) since you’ll get increased dispersion with it.

Also, there should be less spin on the Tour 75 shaft too.

If you’re not sure, you can try both on a launch monitor with the guidance of a club fitter. That way, you can choose the most suitable one.

Ping Tour 65 Shaft Specs: Who Is It For?

The Ping Tour Shaft is most suitable for players with a faster swing speed who need a shaft delivering a low trajectory and spin.

It also helps provide excellent control and stability.

Advanced golfers with a consistent and aggressive swing prefer optimum ball flight and distance.

The Tour 65 shafts are also suitable for players who prefer a more responsive and solid feel at impact, as they provide a firm and stable sensation through the swing.

Is It Worth It?

There’s no wrong or correct answer to this question. Whether this shaft is worth it is relative, as it depends on the player’s skills and preferences.

If you want a high-performing shaft that provides a low launch and less spin, then the Tour 65 could be an excellent option.

However, if you seek a higher launch and more spin or your budget is low, the Tour 65 will not give you the best value.

Related Posts:

• Titleist AP1 vs AP2: Are They Different?
• PXG 0211 Driver Vs. TaylorMade SIM: What’s The Difference?
• Radspeed vs Radspeed X: Are They Different?

Want to Get Better at Golf?

Get "ben hogan's five lessons" and join thousands of others improving their golf skills..

Learn the Fundamentals: Stance and Posture > Golf Grip > The Swing.

This book has LOADS of positive reviews. THOUSANDS OF REVIEWS. A MILLION COPY SOLD. CHEAP!

Your article is confusing….. it is stated that the Tour shaft incorporates a soft tip section ( a soft tip should give you a higher launch ) Then below that in the pros …. it says the shaft has a stiff tip providing a low launch & less spin. ( contradiction ?? ) I have had this shaft for 12 years in different Ping drivers & know it is a lower launch . Also, it states that the Tour shaft used to be made by UST (which was known for it’s stiff tips ) ,then is says they are made now by Aldila, then it says the Chrome & Black shafts are made by UST ( which is it ) & the 2 shafts are different. Black being more stout & stable than the chrome. I have the Chrome but the retailer told me they were the same , just come in different colours ???

Thank you for pointing out some of the contradictions in the article. I can confirm that the tip section is indeed ‘stiff’ and not soft. It is rather the mid section that is soft. Also, it seems that Ping interchanges between Aldila and UST and there is often some confusion even among golfers. As for the Chrome and Black, I explain that they are similar and have little differences. I’ve provided link to the manufacturer’s confirmation on same.

Thanks again for reading.

Hi You refer to Ping Chrome and Ping Chrome 2. Are they different?? Thanks

Actually, both are two different colors for the shaft.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Get plugged in…

PING Blueprint S Irons Review

More in irons:.

50 Words or Less

The PING Blueprint S irons deliver the quintessential players cavity back experience with classic good looks, soft feel, and excellent shot control.  Significantly more forgiving than the Blueprint T.

Introduction

Over the last couple years, one of the things that has become apparent to me is the value of the classic cavity back design (thanks, Karsten).  While there’s certainly value in face technology, multi-material constructions, and hollow body designs, the simple idea of pushing weight to the perimeter makes a massive difference in the performance on mishits.  Having tested the Blueprint T irons [review HERE ], I was very eager to see if the cavity in the PING Blueprint S irons makes these irons accessible to a wide range of players.

If you’re looking for a clean, players look at address, you’ll find it in the PING Blueprint S irons.  These irons check every box: compact blade length, minimal offset, and thin top lines .  The shaping of the toe and leading edge is a little softer than the Blueprint T for players who prefer a slightly more rounded appearance.

In the bag, the Blueprint S stands apart from its brother.  Most obviously, there’s the cavity, but I’d also point to the ribbon of chrome finish near the sole.  This is a design choice that I didn’t care for at first, but it’s grown on me.  It’s the type of thing you might not register consciously at first because of the tasteful way that it’s executed.  Branding is kept extremely minimal with a small “Blueprint S” near the heel and “PING” shifted to the hosel.

Above, you’ll see a comparison of the Blueprint T (left) and the Blueprint S (right).  These irons are built for combo sets with specs that are nearly identical.  The Blueprint S does have more offset in most of the irons, but the maximum difference is 0.03″ – a difference that I defy anyone to see with their naked eye.  Additionally, the top lines and blade lengths are extremely similar.  No matter where you blend your set, it will be a smooth transition.

Sound & Feel

The theme of “traditional” carries forward into the sound and feel of the PING Blueprint S irons.  On center, impact feels very soft and the sound is a quiet “thud.”  They also deliver excellent feedback.  Your hands will know exactly where the ball met the face, and the impact sound shifts toward a “clack” as you move away from center.

I found comparing the Blueprint S to the Blueprint T to be difficult.  On center, I can’t be certain if the Blueprint T irons are a little softer or if that’s just the placebo effect of hitting blades.  Either way, they’re much more similar than they are different.  One thing that was clear was that the feedback on mishits was less stringent in the Blueprint S.  I put in my notes that the Blueprint S delivers clear feedback but sands off some of the roughness .

Performance

I’m going to discuss the performance of the PING Blueprint S irons in three ways: on their own, in comparison to the Blueprint T, and in comparison to other PING irons past and present.

Taken on their own, the Blueprint S irons are a great players cavity back .  With their relatively weak lofts, they have the traditional players iron performance that goes along with their look and feel.  These irons are more concerned with control and stopping power than raw distance, though they do have excellent ball speed on center .  They launch the ball in a controlled, medium window with spin that’s average for this style of iron.

The most notable tech feature of the PING Blueprint S irons is the Precision-Pocket Forging in the 3, 4, and 5 irons (above, lower).  This patented technique allows 10 grams of weight to be moved to the perimeter for higher MOI in the long irons where players need it most.  The best compliment that I can give to this design is that I didn’t notice the transition from the 5I to the 6I.  It’s not a night-and-day gap in forgiveness, but it offers a little extra help to keep your long approaches on target.

Talking about forgiveness is a good place to transition to the comparison with the Blueprint T.  In my launch monitor testing, there was a clear improvement in consistency when I went from the Blueprint T to the Blueprint S .  A mishit that cost me 8 yards with the T might only cost me 4 or 5 with the S.  Additionally, the Blueprint S launched slightly higher with a little less spin.  These were small but consistent differences for me, though other players may see different results.  The landing angles were almost identical with both irons.

As you can see above, the PING Blueprint S irons do have a slightly wider sole than the Blueprint T, but it’s still well within the players category.  I would certainly classify both as “thin.”  Turning to shot control, I don’t feel like there’s anything that the Blueprint T can do that the Blueprint S can’t .  Again, there is undeniably something magical about pure blades, but, with the possible exception of Tour-level ball strikers, I think the Blueprint S gives golfers all the ability they could want to shape shots and control trajectory.

If you’re looking for the spiritual predecessor to the Blueprint S irons, I would point to the PING iBlade [review HERE ].  Both are similar in that they give you the players look and shot control without severely penalizing every misstep.

Finally, while Tour players are building combo sets with the Blueprint T and Blueprint S, we mortals might want to look in the other direction.  The PING i230 irons [review HERE ] have the same loft specs as the Blueprint S but offer a meaningful bump in forgiveness (I don’t think there’s a more forgiving players iron).  Playing the Blueprint S in your scoring irons and the i230 in your longer irons could be a perfect balance of what the mid to low handicapper wants and needs.

The PING Blueprint S irons are among the elite players cavity back irons.  They have the traditional looks and feel that many skilled players prefer while offering a meaningful boost in forgiveness over blades.  Whether you combine them with the Blueprint T, i230, or play them on their own, this is a set that you’ll be happy to have in the bag.

Visit PING HERE

Ping blueprint s irons price & specs.

Recent Posts

• Tour Edge Hot Launch C524 & E524 Irons Review - April 10, 2024
• Mitsubishi Diamana Putter Shaft Review - April 9, 2024
• Golf Pride Reverse Taper Putter Grip Review - April 9, 2024

Matt – great review. What’s more forgiving – the Blueprint S or the PXG 0317 t? Thanks

The 0317 T.

Thanks Matt, this review was excellent and perfect timing for the golf season. And by extension would you say the Ping i230 is even more forgiving than the PXG 0317t?

Those are two that I’d really like to run head to head. My *intuition* is that the i230 may have slightly higher MOI/better dispersion but the 0317 T might preserve ball speed a bit better.

I was looking forward to this review. Well done. I’ve hit these clubs in a fitting studio and the look and feel are very good. I’m glad you mentioned above the comparison of PXG 0317T which I currently game. I could barely tell difference in feel and look at address was pretty close to what I like. I have a pretty happy marriage going on with my 0317’s now so no need to change but I will say Ping has produced a very very nice club here. Nice read.

Hi friends, its fantastic post concerning educationand entirely explained, keep it up all the time.

Leave a Comment Cancel

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Address

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Golf News – April 10, 2024
• Tour Edge Hot Launch C524 & E524 Irons Review
• Mitsubishi Diamana Putter Shaft Review
• Golf Pride Reverse Taper Putter Grip Review
• Golf News – April 8, 2024

Contact Us Advertise Subscribe

Advertise on this site.

Plugged In Golf

Do You Like Free Golf Gear?

Sign up for our weekly newsletter and not only will you get the latest reviews, instruction, and more delivered directly to your inbox, you’ll also be entered into regular giveaways for golf clubs and more.

• Remember me Not recommended on shared computers

Forgot your password?

• WRX Club Techs

Mystery of the Ping Tour shaft

By JD3 August 17, 2020 in WRX Club Techs

• Reply to this topic
• Start new topic

Recommended Posts

65 feels stiff to flex, 75 seems soft - but how to know without published specs

TM Stealth Plus 10.5 Ventus TR Velocore Red 5

Ping G425 Max 5 FW 17.5 Ventus Velocore Red 7

Srixon ZX MKII 3UT MMT 95

Callaway X Forged CB 21' 4-PW Modus 120

Yururi Tataki 52.5, 56.5 and 60.5 DG S200 Ping Anser 2 MCC +4 Grips Kirkland Performance+ Ball

Link to comment

Share on other sites.

• Created 3 yr
• Last Reply 1 yr

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

animalgolfs 8 posts

JD3 5 posts

62@Oakmont 4 posts

Poolparty 4 posts

Aug 17 2020

Aug 24 2020

Dec 10 2021

Popular Posts

May 17, 2021

Hello, I used to play Driver G30 with Ping Tour 65 stiff shaft for the past 5 years, excellent driver. I bought the new G425 Max with the same shaft, again, excellent results.   Ho

July 8, 2021

I remember messaging Danny Li from UST a few years ago. He said The Tour was a variant of the Elements Chome but made to play a little softer in the tip. Slighter higher torque i believe too. 

August 18, 2020

I've never tried the 75 but agree with your assessment that the 65 is true if not firm to flex.  What I don't understand your reference to "publishes specs."   The only specs most OEM's publish is a s

Posted Images

I've never tried the 75 but agree with your assessment that the 65 is true if not firm to flex.  What I don't understand your reference to "publishes specs."   The only specs most OEM's publish is a simple R, S, XL spec, and maybe some reference to launch trajectory.  Where is the issue?

Ping G400 Max driver w/Aldila Rogue 125 Silver Ping G425 5 wood & hybrid Ping G30 irons w/Recoil 95

Ping G425 irons w/Accra ICWT 2.0 95 Ping Glide wedges w/Recoil 110 Ping Redwood Anser - the "real deal!"

3 hours ago, JD3 said: 65 feels stiff to flex, 75 seems soft - but how to know without published specs

Shaft profiles similar to the Aldila Tour Green

PING G430 LST 9* Tour AD DI 6X

Mizuno ST-G 15* Tour AD DI 7X

Titleist TSR2 18* Tour AD DI 85X

Mizuno MP20 HMB 2 Tour AD 95X

Mizuno MP20 HMB 4 Tour AD 95X

Mizuno JPX 919 Tour 5-PW Oban CT115X(-)

Titleist Vokey SM7 52F - 58D

Mizuno M Craft II

Titleist ProV1

3 minutes ago, jlukes said: Shaft profiles similar to the Aldila Tour Green

The Tour 65 is stiffer in the tip.  I profiled one using my frequency meter and the Ping shaft has a very stiff tip and a little extra flex in the mid tip area.  the Tour Green is same as the Rogue Silver and is more uniformity mid-low trajectory (slightly more flexible in the tip but stiffer in the mid tip)

I can't say for sure but I think they tip the driver and not the three wood shafts

animalgolfs

14 minutes ago, Poolparty said: I can't say for sure but I think they tip the driver and not the three wood shafts

True - only on request

9 Clubs Sunday Bag

UST Mamiya - Lamkin - RXS 

https://forums.golfwrx.com/topic/1840618-witb-731-full-bag/

PorkChopExpress

Think Ping Tour shafts are based off the UST Elements 

last shaft I saw said UST in the butt 

Everybody relax, I’m here

Definitely UST, sticker under grip. I like the 65 and respect they made it a true X (others would call it "Tour X" these days). And it feels like a true premium shaft. The 75 I'm not so sure of, more like a watered down "made for" whiteboard. I'm just a little frustrated with ping for being inconsistent making one stiff to flex, the other soft, without providing details on torque and bend profile so users could have an idea beforehand. 

Had a chance to demo 75x yesterday. Like 65x it's the real deal in terms of being an actual X. It's their 75s has a much larger gap into soft territory than the 65s, which retains the stoutness. Maybe they figure traditional S players want a softer, higher launching fairway. 

5 hours ago, JD3 said: Had a chance to demo 75x yesterday. Like 65x it's the real deal in terms of being an actual X. It's their 75s has a much larger gap into soft territory than the 65s, which retains the stoutness. Maybe they figure traditional S players want a softer, higher launching fairway. 

7s tipped 1" 1/4

I contacted Ping regarding specs for the Tour 75. The "S" and "X" are 2.9 and 2.8 torque respectively. The "S" however IMO feels much softer. Maybe it's the butt that's real soft but they retained stiffness throughout rest of shaft?

44 minutes ago, JD3 said: I contacted Ping regarding specs for the Tour 75. The "S" and "X" are 2.9 and 2.8 torque respectively. The "S" however IMO feels much softer. Maybe it's the butt that's real soft but they retained stiffness throughout rest of shaft?

If demo'd a fw with 75s in it - that shaft wasn't tipped. Even the recommended standard 1/2" tipping on 3wd. 

The 75s{or x} they tip 1/2" on driver--they just don't tip the fairways 

PopeofTexas

I love the Ping Tour shafts and I've noticed a little difference between the 65 and 75 as well aside from weight. As a result I have the 65 S in my driver and the 75 X in my 3 wood. I really like them both but I've toyed with putting the 75 S in the 3 wood but if it plays a little softer I may not enjoy that.

PING G430 Max 9* - VENTUS Velocore Blue 6S

PING G425 LST 14.5* - VENTUS Velocore Blue 7S

PING G425 Max 20.5* - Tour AD-IZ 7X

Ping G425 Hybrid 24.5* - VENTUS Blue HB 9X

Srixon ZX5 5/6 ZX7 7-PW - Nippon Modus3 120S

Cleveland RTX Zipcore Tour Rack 50/54/58 - DG Spinner

L.A.B. DF 2.1 - Accra || Artisan 0120 Longneck - BGT Stability Tour

1 hour ago, JD3 said: I contacted Ping regarding specs for the Tour 75. The "S" and "X" are 2.9 and 2.8 torque respectively. The "S" however IMO feels much softer. Maybe it's the butt that's real soft but they retained stiffness throughout rest of shaft?

What you're likely feeling is the longitudinal stiffness.  That's very different from the torsional stiffness.  Torque generally only plays a pretty minor role in the stiffness feel of a shaft.

1 hour ago, Stuart_G said:   What you're likely feeling is the longitudinal stiffness.  That's very different from the torsional stiffness.  Torque generally only plays a pretty minor role in the stiffness feel of a shaft.

Interesting. Do companies report longitudal stiffness too?

1 hour ago, JD3 said: Interesting. Do companies report longitudal stiffness too?

Most don't.  It's not something a single number will help describe since it can change in different ways across the full length of the shaft.  And the ones that do don't really do it in a way that allows you to compare their shafts to shafts from other companies.  It's only really helpful for comparing just their shafts with each other.

golfshaftreviews.com  does independent testing but it takes a subscription to access the good data. 

The Titlest custom shaft option guide online lists tip and butt frequencies.  Not as complete as the full stiffness profile but can still be helpful.  Except of course they wont have the Ping OEM shafts listed.

• 8 months later...

I used to play Driver G30 with Ping Tour 65 stiff shaft for the past 5 years, excellent driver.

I bought the new G425 Max with the same shaft, again, excellent results.

However, I had the terrible idea to order the fairway 5 woods Ping Tour 75 Stiff without fitting, and it is a disater.

As said earlier in this thread, the Tour 75 is much softer than the Tour 65, which is totally incoherent in my opinion.

I've written to Ping and hope to be able to have a switch with the X-Stiff...

4 hours ago, JoachimR said: Hello, I used to play Driver G30 with Ping Tour 65 stiff shaft for the past 5 years, excellent driver. I bought the new G425 Max with the same shaft, again, excellent results.   However, I had the terrible idea to order the fairway 5 woods Ping Tour 75 Stiff without fitting, and it is a disater. As said earlier in this thread, the Tour 75 is much softer than the Tour 65, which is totally incoherent in my opinion.   I've written to Ping and hope to be able to have a switch with the X-Stiff...   Regards

Tour shaft wasn't tipped by Ping...you don't need the x flex....just request tipped 1"[though I suggest 1 1/2"]

The 75 is a noodle even with tipping

Whew, dodged a bullet... ordered the 65X instead of the 75X and absolutely love it. 

Has anyone compared the tour in hybrid vs the rogue black hybrid?

Mizuno ST-Z @7.5 /LA Golf Trono 65X Mizuno ST-Z @16/Oban Devotion 75X Srixon U65 @20/Nippon 130s

Miura CB57 5-PW/Nippon 130S Titleist SM7 50 & 54/Nippon 130S

Cleveland RTX4 58/Nippon 130S

TaylorMade Hi-Toe 62/Nippon 130S LAB DF2.1

I’m gaming 75x in driver. Seems more stable than 65x in driver for me. 

2024 WITB: 

Callaway AI Smoke TD 10.5 Ventus Black 60S (Use MCC +4 only on Driver)

Fairway Wood ??

Callaway Apex UW 19 & 21 deg MMT 70 Stiff

Mizuno JPX 923 HMP 5-PW Project X IO 5.5

Vokey SM10 50.08F & 56M

Callaway Jaws Raw Face Chrome 60Z

Odyssey Dual Force Putter

TaylorMade TP5

ShortSticks

So if I play the 65 s in a driver, and want to play a 75 s in a 3 wood, I should get a used 75 s in a driver shaft and trim it 1/2 inch in the tip and then butt trim to length to get them to play similar.

3 minutes ago, ShortSticks said: So if I play the 65 s in a driver, and want to play a 75 s in a 3 wood, I should get a used 75 s in a driver shaft and trim it 1/2 inch in the tip and then butt trim to length to get them to play similar.

Probably 1" tipping to get that same feel......I tipped mine 1.5" to firm up the feel even more

I believe the driver shaft is already tipped 1". If you buy one with an adapter, screw it on, choke down and hit some ball w it

This was years ago, so I could be wrong. I played the 75 stiff in a fairway felt it was too soft, bought a 75 S driver shaft and it was still too soft. The driver was tipped more but I could barely feel anything as far as stiffness.

I played an untipped 75 X all last year and it was very soft for an X. I think most S players could load it

On 5/18/2021 at 1:00 PM, Patrik1982 said: Has anyone compared the tour in hybrid vs the rogue black hybrid?

Your 85X in a g425 hybrid and so far I love it 🥰  

I used a Ping Tour 75 in the G410 LST 3 wood and i agree it was soooooft

Honestly i could've jumped rope with it

Srixon ZX5 w/PX Hzrdus Red 60

Srixon ZX 15 w/PX Hzrdus Red 70

Tour Edge C723 21* w/PX hzrdus black 80

Titleist T150 4-AW w/PX LZ 6.0

Titleist Jet Black 54/60 with PX LZ 6.0

Deschamps Crisp Antique 

I have a driver G425 with ping tour 65 stiff, very happy with it.

Do you think that a ping tour 75 X on my fairway wood would be a good match in terms of shaft flex?

15 hours ago, Joachim said: Hi all,   I have a driver G425 with ping tour 65 stiff, very happy with it. Do you think that a ping tour 75 X on my fairway wood would be a good match in terms of shaft flex?   Thanks!

I would request tipping of 1"

On 5/23/2021 at 7:19 PM, Joachim said: Hi all,   I have a driver G425 with ping tour 65 stiff, very happy with it. Do you think that a ping tour 75 X on my fairway wood would be a good match in terms of shaft flex?   Thanks!

Hard to say without trying it, but any Ping dealer should have a Tour shaft you can try. The driver shaft is tipped, the fairway is not

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

×   Pasted as rich text.    Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.    Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.    Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

• Insert image from URL
• Submit Reply

Recently Browsing    0 members

• No registered users viewing this page.

Rory McIlroy testing a new TaylorMade "PROTO" 4-iron – 2024 Valero Texas Open

atursky posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , April 3

2024 Valero Texas Open - Discussion and Links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , April 1

2024 Texas Children's Houston Open - Discussion and links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , March 25

2024 Valspar Championship WITB Photos (Thanks to bvmagic)- Discussion & Links to Photos

easyyy posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , March 20

2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational - Discussion and Links to Photos

GolfWRX_Spotted posted a topic in Tour and Pre-Release Equipment , March 4

Popular Now

By hammergolf Started 4 hours ago

By MattyO1984 Started April 2

Welcome. Register Here.

Come on in, the water is fine...

Recent B/S/T

NWAgolf27 · Started 3 hours ago

aph2011 · Started 4 hours ago

danielwkelliher · Started 5 hours ago

cleverprimate24 · Started 6 hours ago

robxpark · Started 6 hours ago

GolfWRX_Spotted · Started December 5, 2023

• Existing user? Sign In

The Bag Room

• Tour & Pre-Release Equipment
• Golf Sims/GPS/RFs/Apps
• Golf Style and Accessories

The Club House

• General Golf Talk
• Classic Golf And Golfers
• Courses, Memberships and Travel
• Groups, Tourneys, and Partners Matching

WRX Academy

• Instruction & Academy
• Rules of Golf and Etiquette
• Swing Videos and Comments

Classifieds & ProShops

• Deal/No Deal

Website Help

• Forum Support
• BST AD Help Forum

My Activity Streams

• BST/Deal Activity
• All Activity
• Unread - No BST/19th
• Subscriptions

Classifieds

• For Sale Forum
• Wanted to Buy
• Mall of Pro Shops
• Where Did My Ad Go?
• Trade In Tool
• Create New...

The perfect Players’ iron? Ping Blueprint S Iron Review

Last Updated: 25 March 2024

A set of Ping Blueprint S Irons sat in a golf bag

At a glance

• TG Rating 5 out of 5
• Owner Rating Not yet rated
• This is Ping's first forged cavity back iron in a decade.
• An excellent blend of sound, feel, and forgiveness within the chassis of a tour iron. 
• Toe and shaft tip weights cleverly up MOI.
• Ping forged irons always represent a sizeable investment. 
• RRP £200.00

What we say...

The forged cavity-back ping blueprint s iron has been developed with the brand’s tour staff to target improved forgiveness from the long irons..

Forged Ping irons used to be rarer than hen’s teeth. For decades Ping have made some of the best golf irons available, but they have almost all been cast rather than forged heads.

Ping’s rare excursions into forged heads included the Anser irons in 2014 and the Ping Blueprint in 2019, both of which were decent irons but didn’t earn the brand a place among the elite when it comes to forged irons.

Ping has always insisted their cast irons can feel and sound every bit as good as their forged counterparts, which is why they have never focused too much on forging. But, through working closely with their elite band of tour stars, they’ve come to better understand the massive premium players at the highest level of the game place on forged irons. When you consider that 95% of PGA Tour events are won by golfers using forged irons, it’s clear to see that not many of the game’s best players will consider a cast head.

As a result, Ping have worked with their tour stars to better meet the players’ list of ‘must haves’ when it comes to irons. The result is the Blueprint S and Blueprint T irons, and here’s everything you need to know about them.

Everything you need to know about the Ping Blueprint S iron

Precision pocket.

Ping has seeded the Blueprint S among staff and non-staff players since the Open Championship at Hoylake in July 2023. Unlike its predecessor, the Ping i59 , the model has quickly become recognized as one of the best players’ irons out on tour.  Non-contract pro Matt Fitzpatrick jumped on board early with the model, winning the Dunhill Championship in October 2023 with a Blueprint S 5-iron in his bag, as did Louis Ousthuizen in South Africa at the back end of 2023.

Both players chose the S thanks to a new patented precision pocket in the cavity which delivered feel, feedback, and additional forgiveness in the long irons that they loved.

Ping say the forged pocket in the 3, 4, and 5 iron frees up 10g of weight, which can be better located to improve forgiveness. Once filled with elastomer, the pocket gives golfers the solid feel and sound expected in a forged players’ iron, along with some unexpected additional playability.     

Fully forged 8620 carbon steel

8620 carbon steel has been Ping’s chosen material for the original Blueprint iron and Forged Pro wedges . It delivers good durability whilst also managing to feel fantastic.

A Hydropearl 2.0 chrome finish over the top dissipates moisture upon impact, which increases shot-to-shot consistency and predictability no matter what the weather or turf conditions.  

Compact, with minimal offset

The Blueprint S is very much a players’ iron so expect a clean, compact profile. And, unusually for Ping irons, there’s very minimal hosel offset.

A thin topline is just what elite players crave, ensuring there’s zero distraction for the eye at address.

A tungsten toe screw and shaft tip weights allow for precise swing weighting to whichever shafts you choose and nudge up MOI thanks to being positioned on the extremities of the head.   

Personally, I also really like the new forged texture inside the cavity; these small details highlight how no stone has been left unturned in the development of this new model.     

Create your perfect combo set

The Blueprint S is bang on the modern trend of brands making several players’ iron options to allow the game’s best golfers to choose how to set up their bag.

The Blueprint S comes with the same lofts as the muscleback Ping Blueprint T and the Ping i230 , meaning golfers can easily mix and match a combo of two or three sets to create their perfect setup across short, mid, and long irons.

Details: Ping Blueprint S iron

RRP: £200 (s) £210 (g)

Availability: 3 – PW

Stock shaft: True Temper Dynamic Gold 120

7-iron loft: 33°

Category: Players’ Iron

Forgiveness rating: 2/5

What Ping say about the Blueprint S iron

“Our two Blueprint irons represent a new strategy for us in the forged-iron category,” said John K. Solheim, PING CEO & President. “With the forged and forgiving cavity-back design of the “S” and the traditional muscle-back shape of the “T”, we’re targeting a wider range of golfers who prefer tour-style forged irons. The Blueprint name is a signal to skilled golfers looking for control, precision and feel from their irons. As the name implies, no details have been overlooked in the development of the new irons. Both models are engineered and manufactured to exact standards and deliver the performance expected in a PING iron.”

“We’ve already seen multiple tour wins with the Blueprint S, including by PING Pro Sahith Theegala, who earned his first PGA Tour title last fall in his first tournament with the new irons,” said Solheim. “Louis Oosthuizen won back-to-back weeks with a combo set of the Blueprint S and T irons, an approach we planned for by matching the standard lofts of each set, allowing golfers to blend their preferred models within our precision-iron line. The tour adoption is growing almost daily as we begin the new tour season.”

“The Blueprint S is going to be a pleasant surprise for a lot of golfers who might not think they are good enough to play them,” Solheim said. “Its design speaks to the lower handicap, but its technology broadens its appeal to the player who is looking for a forged, blade-style iron that’s a little easier to hit but still delivers the look and feel expected in a blade.”

What players say about the Ping Blueprint S iron

Viktor Hovland: “I think the new Blueprint irons – particularly the Blueprint S, because that’s what I’ve been testing – they just look incredible when you grip them and look down to the ball. They’re such a good-looking iron. And then when you hit a good shot, dead out the center, the turf interaction is really pure and the ball flight is nice. It gives you all the good feels when you hit a good shot. It’s not a surprise how it’s already doing well out on tour.

“I’d say the Blueprint T is more for the elite player, just because the size of the blade is small. If you’re just a ‘good’ player who’s looking for a little bit of extra feel between the heel and the toe shots and maybe want to curve it a little bit more, I think it’s a good alternative for anyone who’s a good iron player and wants to have a bit more control.”

Sahith Theegala: “The Blueprint S, for me, still has the sleek design of a blade. It looks good to the eye. You’re staring at this club for thousands of hours a year, so you want it to look good to your eye. It looked great to me straight away. I don’t switch too easily, but this was the one thing in my whole golf career that made me switch instantly. I just felt so comfortable with it. It has a little less offset than the iBlade and it’s nice to see the iron a little more flush [to the ball]. I’ve always been that way with wedges, so now that my irons are like that through the bag, it’s a bonus.

Tyrrell Hatton: “I’d been using the i230 but as soon as I saw the Blueprint S I was amazed. They look very similar in size and it felt like I was still going to have that forgiveness. It felt like a pretty easy switch and it wasn’t something that I was concerned about at all.

Video: How does the Ping Blueprint S compare to other leading 2024 Players’ Irons?

Verdict: Ping Blueprint S iron

It’s taken the new Blueprint S no time to establish itself and get its feet under the table out on tour, appearing in both Ping staff and uncontracted player’s bags since first being revealed in July 2023. Forged Ping irons just aren’t all that common and when a very good one like the S comes along players literally fall over themselves to put the model in play. The i230 might still be Ping’s most-played tour iron but the Blueprint S will surely run it close for its crown once its first full year out on tour is complete.

I’ve been testing Ping irons for 15+ years and I can confidently say I’ve never been so excited by any of the brand’s previous player-focused models. The Blueprint S has a beautifully simple head shape, gone completely is the ‘boxy’ or longer blade length shape that critics used to put the brand’s better player models down for. In my mind, the S is right there alongside the Mizuno Pro 243 and Srixon ZX 7 MK II as one of the very best-shaped players’ irons of the year.

Our test pro loved the forged feel, and sound, preferring the impact sensation to his own set of cast i230’s, a model he’s played for nearly 18 months. Comparing the two sets the pair are almost identical in terms of data bar the four yards carry distance gain in favor of the S. Just remember choosing players’ irons should be more about shape, feel, ball flight, and consistency, so if ball speed and distance creep into your thinking, you really should be looking at players distance irons instead.

In terms of distance, the S carried shots comfortably above our test average (3 yards), with the carry distance drop-off and shot area being just below and above the test averages respectively. That sort of performance says to me the model is well decked out to perform across the board for consistent ball strikers.      

Any decision between the S and i230 is likely to come down to how much premium you put on playing forged irons. Out on tour, this is huge, hence why the Blueprint S is seeing such success in the hands of the best players in the world. For decent club golfers price is also likely to be a factor as a 7-piece steel shafted set will set you back £140 more by opting for the forged S. When making your decision don’t forget to factor in the new pocket cavity tech in the S long irons, which will offer up a little more forgiveness.

In my book, the Blueprint S is a stunning set of irons, thanks to being forged and deliciously well shaped they have all the hallmarks of being a timeless classic set, hence why they’re among my five best players’ irons of 2024.      

Data comparison: How does the Ping Blueprint S compare to leading competitor Players’ Irons?

Check out the best players’ irons .

Read our review of the Ping Blueprint T irons .

BECOME A TODAY’S GOLFER MEMBER:  Unlimited access to premium content and exclusive rewards!

About the Author

Simon Daddow –  Today’s Golfer  Equipment Editor

Having tested and played more than 10,000 clubs in his life, what Simon doesn’t know about golf clubs isn’t worth knowing.

He’s a specialist in all things metal having spent a large part of his career as a golf club maker and product development manager, and has worked in the golf industry for more than 30 years.

He joined EMAP Active (now Bauer Media) as Equipment Editor in 2006 and has made todays-golfer.com the most reliable source for golf club testing.

You can contact Simon via  email  and follow him on  Twitter  for loads more golf equipment insight.

Product Information

Ping blueprint s iron.

Availability: 3 - PW

Stock shaft:  True Temper Dynamic Gold 120 (S300, X100), PING Alta CB Black graphite (SR, R, S)

Construction: One piece forged 8620 carbon steel

Visit the Ping website here

Your Reviews

Ping irons user reviews.